Publications
Detailed Information
법(法)에서의 가치(價値)와 가치판단(價値判斷): 원고적격(原告適格)의 규범학(規範學)(1) : Value and Valuation in Law: Deontology of Standing(1)
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 조홍식 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-05T06:36:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-05T06:36:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.48 No.1, pp. 160-203 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10103 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This essay concerns the meaning of incommensurability and its significance for
law. First of all, Part II of this essay observes that disagreement among individuals concerning human values, goods, and norms is the most important factual aspect of the human conditions by considering John Rawls circumstances of justice and Jeremy Waldrons circumstances of politics. It also emphasizes the felt need to act together in the face of such disagreement. This essay claims that incommensurability is the main cause of such disagreement. Part III of this essay defines the incommensurability by adopting a now-famous example from Joseph Raz: If I have the options of spending an afternoon walking in the park, enjoying a glass of scotch, or enjoying a glass of wine, and if the wine option is better than the scotch option, and if neither the wine option nor the scotch option is better or worse than the park option, then I have a choice between incommensurables on my hands, because each of the drink options is not better than, worse than, or equally good as the park option. It also observes that incommensurability of values and diversity of valuations are both sides of the same coin by comparing H. L. A. Harts internal point of view with Razs constitutive incommensurability. Part IV examines tragic consequences caused by conflict of values and valuations. In a slight digression, this essay touches upon famous novels called Don Quixote, Hamlet, Sophies Choice, the Unbearable Lightness of Being, to highlight how these novels exemplify the tragedy that radical incommensurability may put individuals in. It also overviews Michel de Montaignes idea, skepticism that prevailed the time of the Wars of Religion. Part V introduces such philosophers as Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes, Immanuel... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단출연 법학연구소 기금의 2007학년 학술연구비의
지원을 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 실천이성 | - |
dc.subject | 정치의 상황 | - |
dc.subject | 구성적 통약불능성 | - |
dc.subject | 법실증주의 | - |
dc.subject | 의견불일치 | - |
dc.subject | 통약불능성 | - |
dc.subject | 초연한 언명 | - |
dc.subject | 헌신결정한 관점 | - |
dc.title | 법(法)에서의 가치(價値)와 가치판단(價値判斷): 원고적격(原告適格)의 규범학(規範學)(1) | - |
dc.title.alternative | Value and Valuation in Law: Deontology of Standing(1) | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Cho, Hong Sik | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 203 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 160-203 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 160 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 48 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.