Publications
Detailed Information
2006년도 주요 민법(民法) 관련 판례 회고 : A Review of Civil Law Cases decided in 2006
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 윤진수 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-05T06:52:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-05T06:52:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.48 No.1, pp. 371-449 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10111 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper reviews 33 korean cases on Civil Law decided in 2006. Among
these cases, 2 cases are the most important. 1. On April 20, 2006, the Korean Supreme Court overruled its own precedents regarding the split of a church. According to the former precedents, the members of a church at the time of the split were collective owners of the property of the church regardless of the split. But these precedents were much criticized because the court could not resolve the dispute of the church members. So the new decision denied the split of a church as a legal concept. Rather, the decision declared, the so-called split of a church is nothing but a collective secession. So the seceded members cannot assert any right upon the church's property. But the church can change the denomination with the approval of more than two-thirds of the members. In my opinion, this new decision comports with the purpose of the law for the resolution of the dispute. 2. The majority opinion of the Korean Supreme Court decision on June 22, 2006 declared that the sex of a woman in the family register who received a transsexual operation could be changed from woman to man by way of the family register correction. But the minority opinion asserted that the transsexual operation should not be a cause of the family register correction as a matter of interpretation of law. According to the minority opinion, the legislature, not the court, had the competence to decide whether transsexual operation should be the cause of the change of sex in the family register. This decision can be compared with the decision of the House of Lords of U. K on April 10, 2003. In Bellinger v. Bellinger, [2003] 2 W.L.R. 117 the House... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2007학년도 학술연구비
의 지원을 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 교회의 분열 | - |
dc.subject | 공통의 착오 | - |
dc.subject | 파산관재인의 제3자성 | - |
dc.subject | 소멸시효의 남용 | - |
dc.subject | 부당리득 | - |
dc.subject | 성전환 | - |
dc.subject | 취득시효 | - |
dc.subject | 초상권 | - |
dc.subject | 저당권 | - |
dc.subject | split of a church | - |
dc.subject | trustee of a bankrupt debtor as a third person | - |
dc.subject | the abuse of prescription | - |
dc.subject | adverse posse | - |
dc.subject | common mistake | - |
dc.title | 2006년도 주요 민법(民法) 관련 판례 회고 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Review of Civil Law Cases decided in 2006 | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Yune, Jin Su | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 449 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 371-449 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 371 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 48 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.