SHERP

판례, 어떻게 볼 것인가?-다양한 시각과 쟁점 ; 벤담의 Common Law 체계에 대한 비판과 입법론 구상에 대한 연구
A Search for New Perspectives on Judicial Precedent ; A Study about the Criticism on the Common Law System and the Construction of Theory of Legislation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이상영-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-07-
dc.date.available2009-10-07-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citation법학, Vol.49 No3 pp.1-39en
dc.identifier.issn1598-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lawi.snu.ac.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/10222-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to arrange and situate Bentham’s critical evaluation of
Common Law system, to trace the assumptions on the stare decisis of Common
Law in eighteenth- and nineteenth century in Britain, and thereby to propose(or
gain) some useful perspective of the meaning of stare decisis. To perceive, at least
access to the Bentham’s evaluation of Common Law and stare decisis in Common
Law theory, it is in its nature necessary to understand and conceptualize the line
of Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism and analytical judicial reasoning. The line of
Bentham’s thought, based on ‘utility’, goes in phases further, critique of Common
Law - rule(or law) in general - jurisprudence(analytical legal theory) - court and
judicial process - legal reform and legislation(legislation and adjudication) -
‘Pannomion’(‘Complete Code of Laws’).
Bentham, in his lifelong academic writings, attacked both the practice and the
theory of Common Law, so much as he challenged aggressively to natural rights,
for example the Declaration of Rights. Bentham’s argument and critique of
Common Law theory and stare decisis in Common Law system focused on two
problems. First, although the principle of stare decisis has a actual effect and
substantial meaning, if it will be consistently, law is and must be, a matter of
public standards, publicly declared, publicly authorized and publicly accessible.
Second, as his attack to natural rights with the concept of ‘fiction of law’, he dare
to point out that judge-made law in Common Law system is not so much as ‘dog
law’ because it is typically the way one teaches a dog to behave.
Ultimately, maybe Bentham attempted to lay the foundation for the plan of the...
en
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 2008학년도 한국방송통신대학교 학술연구비의 지원을 받아 작성된 것임.en
dc.language.isokoen
dc.publisher서울대학교 법학연구소en
dc.subject제레미 벤담en
dc.subject선례구속원칙en
dc.subject공리성en
dc.subjectJeremy Benthamen
dc.subjectCommon Law, stare decisisen
dc.subjectconcept of Lawen
dc.subjectLegislationen
dc.subject입법en
dc.title판례, 어떻게 볼 것인가?-다양한 시각과 쟁점 ; 벤담의 Common Law 체계에 대한 비판과 입법론 구상에 대한 연구en
dc.title.alternativeA Search for New Perspectives on Judicial Precedent ; A Study about the Criticism on the Common Law System and the Construction of Theory of Legislationen
dc.typeSNU Journalen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorLee, Sang Young-
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) 법학법학 Volume 49, Number 1/4 (2008)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse