Publications

Detailed Information

Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seung Ja-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Woo Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Nariya-
dc.contributor.authorCha, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sun Mi-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Jung-Gi-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-13T23:23:27Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-13T23:23:27Z-
dc.date.issued2006-09-23-
dc.identifier.citationRadiology 2006;241:695-701en
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1527-1315 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17114620-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/10420-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the sensitivity of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for depicting breast cancer in three digital mammographic views. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted with institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. A commercially available CAD system was applied to the craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral digital mammographic views of 83 women (mean age, 48 years; range, 30-66 years) with 83 histologically proved breast cancers. Findings were 59 masses and 41 microcalcifications (17 lesions showed both findings; 42 lesions, mass only; and 24 lesions, microcalcification only). The paired t test was used to analyze sensitivity of the CAD system for the detection of cancer in these three mammographic views and in combinations of the views. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the CAD system were 92% (76 of 83) in the craniocaudal view, 83% (69 of 83) in the mediolateral oblique view, and 86% (71 of 83) in the mediolateral view; the differences were not significant (P = .07-.62). Sensitivity increased to 96% (80 of 83) in the craniocaudal plus mediolateral oblique views and to 99% (82 of 83) in the craniocaudal plus mediolateral oblique plus mediolateral views. For masses, the sensitivity of the CAD system was 76% (45 of 59) in the craniocaudal view and 75% (44 of 59) in the mediolateral oblique view and increased to 93% (55 of 59) when mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were combined (P < .001). For microcalcifications, sensitivity was 98% (40 of 41) in the craniocaudal view and 95% (39 of 41) in the mediolateral oblique view, and this increased to 100% (41 of 41) when the mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were combined (P = .31). CONCLUSION: The sensitivities of the CAD system were not significantly different among these three digital mammographic views. Sensitivity for depicting masses was significantly increased (P < .001) when the craniocaudal view was added to the mediolateral oblique view.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North Americaen
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms/*radiographyen
dc.subjectFalse Positive Reactionsen
dc.subjectMammography/*methodsen
dc.subjectPatient Selectionen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.subjectRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted-
dc.titleComputer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral viewsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김승자-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문우경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조나리야-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor차주희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김선미-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임정기-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2413051145-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share