Publications

Detailed Information

Isolated full-thickness cervical stromal invasion warrants post-hysterectomy pelvic radiotherapy in FIGO stages IB-IIA uterine cervical carcinoma

Cited 6 time in Web of Science Cited 5 time in Scopus
Authors

Moon, Sung Ho; Wu, Hong-Gyun; Ha, Sung W; Lee, Hyo Pyo; Kang, Soon Beom; Song, Yong Sang; Park, Noh Hyun; Kim, Jae Won; Park, In Ae; Kim, Baek Hui

Issue Date
2006-08-28
Publisher
Academic Press
Elsevier
Citation
Gynecol Oncol 2006;104:152-7
Keywords
Combined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy/adverse effectsStromal Cells/pathologySurvival RateTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical Neoplasms/*pathology/*radiotherapy/surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in women with isolated full-thickness cervical stromal invasion (FTSI) as an unfavorable pathological finding after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in FIGO stages IB-IIA cervical carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 1868 patients with stages IB-IIA cervical carcinoma underwent radical hysterectomy and PLND between January 1982 and December 2002. Seventy-four of these patients had isolated FTSI without any other unfavorable pathological finding, such as lymph node metastasis, microscopic parametrial involvement, involved resection margin, lympho-vascular space invasion, or large clinical tumor diameter (>4 cm). Forty-one of these patients had no adjuvant treatment (S group) and 33 received PORT (PORT group). Patients with isolated FTSI who received chemotherapy were excluded. Treatment outcomes in the PORT and S groups were compared. RESULTS: Ten-year disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic-failure-free survival (PFFS) of S group vs. PORT group were 73.2% vs. 92.4% (P=0.038) and 79.8% vs. 97.0% (P=0.044), respectively. According to a Cox proportional hazards model developed by forward, stepwise regression incorporating all prognostic variables, only PORT was marginally significant for DFS (RR 0.234; 95% CI 0.051-1.067; P=0.061) and significant for PFFS (RR 0.055; 95% CI 0.005-0.620; P=0.019). A grade 4 late complication developed in two patients (6%) in PORT group. CONCLUSION: PORT administered to patients with isolated FTSI after radical hysterectomy and PLND improves pelvic control in FIGO stages IB-IIA cervical carcinoma with acceptable morbidity.
ISSN
0090-8258 (Print)
Language
English
URI
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WG6-4KRY3J9-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=02e38851e0a1120e1db0a4c3c09bf681

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16935323

https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10422
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.012
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share