S-Space College of Humanities (인문대학) English Language and Literature (영어영문학과) Theses (Master's Degree_영어영문학과)
A Construction-based Approach to English Appositives
영어 동격구문에 대한 구문 기반 접근
|dc.description||학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 영어영문학과 영어학전공, 2015. 8. 유은정.||-|
|dc.description.abstract||The aim of this study is to investigate the syntax and semantics of English appositives within a construction-based Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) approach. Unlike previous studies, this study particularly focuses on the possibility that appositives can appear nonadjacent to the anchor noun phrase, either clause-medially or clause-finally. In previous literature, these nonadjacent appositives have been studied under the term afterthoughts instead of being subsumed under the appositional construction.
By showing that afterthoughts possess the various properties that have been attested for appositives, I argue that appositives in the traditional sense (the anchor-adjacent ones) and afterthoughts should be treated a single construction. Therefore, I call appositives that appear adjacent to the anchor anchor-adjacent appositives and those that appear nonadjacent to the anchor afterthought appositives.
There is no consensus among scholars on the syntactic status of the appositive. Some scholars, including Ott (2014), do not assume any syntactic relationship between the appositive and the host clause. Some others, for example Heringa (2007, 2012a), assimilate appositives to a coordination structure. These analyses are problematic in that they either miss the fact that the anchor and the appositive clearly form a syntactic constituent, or cannot be generalized to account for other parenthetical modifiers.
Therefore, I propose that appositives are syntactically integrated into the host clause as NP-adjuncts. Specifically, I propose a new subtype of the head-modifier-cx (construction): head-parenthetical-modifier-cx. This construction includes various kinds of parenthetical modifiers, including appositives (head-appositive-cx). The head-appositive-cx has two subtypes: head-predicative-appositive-cx and head-identificational-appositive-cx.
The nonadjacency between the anchor and the afterthought appositive is also explained through an already existing syntactic mechanism. Specifically, I use the feature EXTRA, which has been employed to account for various extraposition phenomena (Keller, 1995
|dc.description.abstract||Van Eynde, 1996||-|
|dc.description.abstract||Kay & Sag, 2012). By using this feature, clause-medial afterthought appositives and clause-final afterthought appositives are both well accounted for.
In terms of semantics, I propose a new semantic dimension to deal with parenthetical elements, inspired by Potts’ (2005) work. As a result, SEM now has two subdimensions: M-SEM (matrix semantics) and P-SEM (parenthetical semantics). I provide a detailed account of how such bidimensional semantics works within the HPSG framework, interacting with the constraints on the newly proposed types and the existing semantic principles.
A direct consequence of my account is that the parenthetical properties of appositives are dealt with in semantics, instead of having to assume a non-standard syntactic structure.
2. The Appositive Construction: Phenomena
2.1 Properties Shared by Anchor-adjacent Appositives and Afterthought Appositives
2.1.1 Discourse Markers
2.1.2 Semantics of Appositives
2.1.3 Parenthetical Properties of Appositives
2.2 Similar but different constructions
2.2.1 Appositive Relatives
2.2.3 Free Adjuncts
3. Previous Studies on Appositives and Problems
3.1 Potts (2005, 2007)
3.2 Ott (2014)
3.3 Heringa (2007, 2012a)
4.1 Theoretical Background
4.2 The Hierarchy of Constructional Types
4.3 Positional Possibilities of the Afterthought Appositive
4.4 Parenthetical Semantics
|dc.title||A Construction-based Approach to English Appositives||-|
|dc.title.alternative||영어 동격구문에 대한 구문 기반 접근||-|
- Appears in Collections:
- College of Humanities (인문대학)English Language and Literature (영어영문학과)Theses (Master's Degree_영어영문학과)