Publications

Detailed Information

Seismic Performance Evaluation of the High-Rise Building Using Nonlinear Analysis : 비선형 해석을 통한 초고층 건물의 내진성능 평가

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor강현구-
dc.contributor.author정승용-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:31:17Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:31:17Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000146176-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137320-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 공과대학 건축학과, 2017. 8. 강현구.-
dc.description.abstractA core wall system is commonly used as a lateral-load-resisting system of a high-rise building. The use of coupled shear walls connected by coupling beams is necessary due to the presence of openings at the core walls. Generally coupling beams yield prior to shear walls under seismic actions, because the beams are designed much weaker than the walls. Likewise, the cyclic behavior of coupling beam elements significantly affects the energy dissipation characteristics of a core wall system. In this study, the seismic performance evaluation of a high-rise building with core wall system is carried out by performing a series of nonlinear static and dynamic analyses using ETABS 2016. The nonlinear time history analyses are conducted using seven earthquake records at each of Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) levels. And the results of seismic performance evaluations by nonlinear static procedure and time history analyses are compared. The responses of the high-rise building according to the modeling methods of the basement and the characteristics of earthquake records are also studied.
Based on the analysis results, the coefficient method suggested by ASCE 41-13 nonlinear static analysis procedure generally overestimates the seismic performance of the high-rise building compared to the nonlinear time history analysis. The responses above the ground level are similar regardless of the basement modeling methods, but there are large differences below the ground level depending on the basement models. The responses of nonlinear time history analysis are very sensitive depending on the characteristics of ground motions. Because of the influence of the higher modes, the results of the nonlinear time history analysis largely differ from those of the nonlinear static analysis.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Scope and objectives 3
1.3 Organization 3
Chapter 2. Literature Review 4
2.1 Design codes and guidelines 4
2.1.1 Korean design codes and guidelines 4
2.1.2 ASCE 41-13 6
2.1.3 PEER/ATC 72-1 7
2.1.4 Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings (TBI 2017) 8
2.2 Previous studies 9
2.2.1 Xiao et al. (1999) 9
2.2.2 Naish et al. (2013) 12
Chapter 3. Analysis Model 14
3.1 Synopsis of analysis model 14
3.2 Material model 17
3.2.1 Expected strength 17
3.2.2 Concrete model 19
3.2.3 Reinforcement model 21
3.2.4 Structural steel model 24
3.3 Modeling of slabs 25
3.4 Modeling of outrigger walls 26
3.5 Modeling of vertical members 27
3.5.1 Fiber model for columns 27
3.5.2 Fiber model for walls 29
3.6 Modeling of coupling beams 30
3.6.1 Effective stiffness of coupling beam 31
3.6.2 Backbone curve of coupling beam 31
3.6.3 Hysteretic behavior of coupling beam 33
3.6.4 Verification 36
3.7 Modeling of underground structure 39
3.8 Modal analysis results 43
3.9 Damping 44
Chapter 4. Ground Motion Records 46
4.1 Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) records 46
4.1.1 Response spectrum of DBE 46
4.1.2 Ground motion records of DBE 47
4.2 Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) records 51
4.2.1 Response spectrum of MCE 51
4.2.2 Ground motion records of MCE 52
Chapter 5. Nonlinear Static Analysis 55
5.1 Load set 55
5.2 Analysis results 56
5.2.1 X-dir. pushover analysis results 56
5.2.2 Y-dir. pushover analysis results 57
5.3 Performance evaluation 59
5.3.1 ASCE 41-13 target displacement 59
5.4 Discussion 65
Chapter 6. Nonlinear Time History Analysis 66
6.1 Load set 66
6.2 Analysis results and performance evaluation of DBE 69
6.2.1 Maximum displacement and interstory drift 69
6.2.2 States of nonlinear hinges and fiber elements 70
6.3 Analysis results of MCE 73
6.3.1 Maximum displacement and interstory drift 73
6.3.2 States of nonlinear hinges and fiber elements 74
6.4 Influence of the outrigger walls 75
6.5 Influence of modeling of underground structure 76
6.5.1 Maximum displacement 76
6.5.2 Plastic rotation of coupling beams 78
6.5.3 Core wall shear forces near the ground level 80
6.5.4 Discussion 81
6.6 Responses depending on the characteristics of ground motions 82
6.7 Comparisons with the nonlinear static analysis 92
6.8 Discussion 94
Chapter 7. Conclusion 96
References 99
국 문 초 록 101
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent4603299 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectSeismic Performance-
dc.subjectHigh-Rise Building-
dc.subjectNonlinear Dynamic Analysis-
dc.subjectBasement-
dc.subjectCoupling Beam-
dc.subject.ddc690-
dc.titleSeismic Performance Evaluation of the High-Rise Building Using Nonlinear Analysis-
dc.title.alternative비선형 해석을 통한 초고층 건물의 내진성능 평가-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건축학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share