SHERP

Switzerland’s State Response on the European Refugee Crisis 2015
2015년 유럽 난민 사태에 대한 스위스 정부의 대응

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorSong Jiyeoun-
dc.contributor.author아니나-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T03:51:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-29T03:51:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.other000000150414-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/141740-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제대학원 국제학과, 2018. 2. Song Jiyeoun.-
dc.description.abstractDuring the year 2015, over 1.3 million asylum applications were filed in Europe, almost double the number of applications in 2014. Likewise, in Switzerland, the asylum applications doubled by 2015 and reached a high of 39,523. According to a broad literature body, such an increase of asylum applications can lead, in theory, to a more restrictive asylum policy. Therefore, this study evaluates the Swiss state response in terms of restrictiveness and deterrence measures. To accomplish this, Switzerland’s actions concerning the refugee crisis are evaluated using Gibney and Hanson’s (2003) theory on restrictive state measures. The findings show significant reactions in the categories of: legal changes, cooperation, and border protection. Breaking down the responses into restrictive and positive answers is less conducive however, since some of the categories contain both restrictive as well as positive measures. Overall, it can be observed that Switzerland’s in-country measures are mostly positive measures - like the amendment of the asylum procedure - while the adopted pre-entry measures are restrictive. The latter includes a fortification of national as well as European border protection.-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 1
1.1. Objective 3
1.2. Methodology 6
1.3. Outline 8
2. Literature Review 9
2.1. Factors Influencing the Asylum Policy 9
2.2. Classification of Restrictive Policies 12
2.3. Problems of Restricting and Deterring Measures 16
3. Background 19
3.1. Legal Background 19
3.1.1. Important International Legal Documents 19
3.1.2. Important EU Legal Documents 20
3.2. Swiss Asylum Law 23
3.2.1. Development of Swiss Asylum Law 23
3.2.2. Important Notions of the Swiss Asylum Act 1998 (Status as of 1 October 2016) 25
3.3. Factual Background 28
3.3.1. Refugee Flows to Europe 29
3.3.2. Refugee Flows to Switzerland 32
4. Analysis 36
4.1. Measures to Prevent Access to State Territorial 37
4.1.1. Interdiction to Access Territory 37
4.2. Measures to Limit Stay 42
4.2.1. Exclusion from Asylum Process 42
4.2.2. Speeding up Asylum Process 46
4.3. Measures to Manage Arrival 48
4.3.1. More Efficient Decision Making 48
4.3.2. Resettlement 50
4.3.3. Burden-Sharing 51
4.4. Evaluation 54
4.4.1. Restrictions in the Legal System? 55
4.4.2. A Role-model Regarding Cooperative Behaviour? 63
4.4.3. Physical Deterrence – Interdiction to Access National Territory? 67
5. Conclusion 72
6. References 76
7. Abstract (Korean) 95
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1739365 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectRefugee Crisis-
dc.subjectEurope-
dc.subjectSwitzerland-
dc.subjectAsylum-
dc.subjectRestrictive Asylum Policies-
dc.subjectDeterrence Measures-
dc.subject.ddc327.17-
dc.titleSwitzerland’s State Response on the European Refugee Crisis 2015-
dc.title.alternative2015년 유럽 난민 사태에 대한 스위스 정부의 대응-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorZimmermann, Anina C.-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과-
dc.date.awarded2018-02-
Appears in Collections:
Graduate School of International Studies (국제대학원)Dept. of International Studies (국제학과)Theses (Master's Degree_국제학과)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse