Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABR

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jong Min-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hong-Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hak Jae-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Chang Heon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung-in-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-01T06:19:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-01T15:20:18Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationRadiation Oncology. 14(1):105ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1748-717X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/156081-
dc.description.abstractBackground
The aim of this study was to compare the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (MRI-based-IMRT) with the MRIdian Linac system to that of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with the TrueBeam STx system for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods
A total of 22 patients with tumors located in the lower lobe were retrospectively selected for the study. For each patient, both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and identical structures with the exception of the planning target volume (PTV). The PTVs of the MRI-based-IMRT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 3 mm from the gross tumor volume, whereas those of VMAT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 5 mm from the internal target volume. For both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT, the prescription doses to the PTVs were 60 Gy in four fractions.

Results
The average PTV volume of the MRI-based-IMRT was approximately 4-times smaller than that of VMAT (p < 0.001). The maximum dose to the bronchi for the MRI-based-IMRT was smaller than that for the VMAT (20.4 Gy versus 24.2 Gy, p < 0.001). In addition, V40Gy of the rib for the MRI-based-IMRT was smaller than that for the VMAT (1.8 cm3 versus 7.7 cm3, p = 0.008). However, the maximum doses to the skin and spinal cord for the MRI-based-IMRT (33.0 Gy and 14.5 Gy, respectively) were larger than those for the VMAT (27.8 Gy and 11.0 Gy, respectively) showing p values of less than 0.02. For the ipsilateral lung, the mean dose, V20Gy, V10Gy, and V5Gy for the MRI-based-IMRT were smaller than those for the VMAT (all with p < 0.05). For the contralateral lung, V5Gy, V10Gy, D1500cc, and D1000cc for the MRI-based-IMRT were larger than those for the VMAT (all with p < 0.05). The mean dose and V50% of the whole body for the MRI-based-IMRT were smaller than those for the VMAT (0.9 Gy versus 1.2 Gy, and 78.7 cm3 versus 103.5 cm3, respectively, all at p < 0.001).

Conclusions
The MRI-based-IMRT using the MRIdian Linac system could reduce doses to bronchi, rib, ipsilateral lung, and whole body compared to VMAT for lung SABR when the tumor was located in the lower lobe.
ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2017M2A2A7A02020640, 2017M2A2A7A02020641, and 2017M2A2A7A02020643).ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectMR-IGRTko_KR
dc.subjectMR-linacko_KR
dc.subjectVMATko_KR
dc.subjectPlanning studyko_KR
dc.subjectSABRko_KR
dc.titleComparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABRko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박종민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor우홍견-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김학재-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최창헌-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김정인-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13014-019-1314-0-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.date.updated2019-06-16T04:00:16Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share