Publications

Detailed Information

First-line Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Cited 43 time in Web of Science Cited 46 time in Scopus
Authors

Kim, Ryul; Keam, Bhumsuk; Hahn, Seokyung; Ock, Chan-Young; Kim, Miso; Kim, Tae Min; Kim, Dong-Wan; Heo, Dae Seog

Issue Date
2019-09
Publisher
Cancer Information Group
Citation
Clinical Lung Cancer, Vol.20 No.5, pp.331-338.e4
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized lung cancer management. Our study focused on the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer by summarizing 4 phase III clinical trials. This analysis revealed that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy exhibited better survival outcome than pembrolizumab monotherapy. Background: This study aimed to comprehensively review the available evidence regarding the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to compare pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Materials and Methods: A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2018, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings (2015-2018) were reviewed. Summaries of the results were pooled using a random-effect model to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their 95% confidence intervals (Cis). A network meta-analysis was used to indirectly compare pembrolizumab monotherapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Results: A total of 4 relevant phase III trials comprising 2754 patients were identified. Pembrolizumab (with or without chemotherapy) led to significant improvements in OS and PFS, irrespective of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS). In particular, for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS > 50%, the HR of PFS was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001), and that of OS was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < .001). In terms of PFS, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with an HR of PFS 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-0.99; P = .048) for the subgroup with PD-L1 TPS > 50%. Conclusions: For patients with NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS > 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has a better PFS than pembrolizumab monotherapy in this meta-analysis. To confirm this finding, a prospective phase III trial that directly compares the treatments is warranted. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1525-7304
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/165201
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2019.05.009
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share