Browse

구순구개열 환자의 상악골 열성장에서 골신장술을 위한 Internal distraction device와 Rigid external distraction의 비교
INTERNAL VS. RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION DEVICE FOR THE MAXILLARY HYPOPLASIA OF CLEFT PATIENTS

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
팽준영; 명훈; 황순정; 서병무; 최진영; 이종호; 정필훈; 백승학; 김명진
Issue Date
2005
Publisher
대한악안면성형재건외과학회
Citation
대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 27(4) : 324-333, 2005
Keywords
Distraction OsteogenesisCleft Lip and PalateMaxillary HypoplasiaRigid external distraction
Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis for the advancement of hypoplastic maxilla of cleft patients has shown successful results. In this report, rigid external distraction(RED) system and internal distraction device were used for maxillary advancement. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Larger amount of advancement can be achieved with RED system. But complex external device may give patients psychological stress. Internal device is invisible. However its distraction amount have limitation for the advancement (< 20mm) and the vector cannot be changed freely during distraction. The authors treated five cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia(three with RED system and two with internal distractor). Their results were clinically satisfactory. We present the pros and cons of RED and internal system for maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
ISSN
1225-4207
Language
Korean
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/47610
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Dentistry/School of Dentistry (치과대학/치의학대학원)Dept. of Dentistry (치의학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_치의학과)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse