Browse

Effect of implant designs on insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) value

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPiao, Chun-Mei-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Seong-Joo-
dc.contributor.authorKoak, Jai-Young-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seong-Kyun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Chong-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Xian-Hao-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-01T09:55:05Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-01T09:55:05Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citation대한치과보철학회지 2006;44:325-332.en
dc.identifier.issn0301-2875-
dc.identifier.urihttp://uci.or.kr/G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200631036999165)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/47872-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Primary implant stability has long been identified as a prerequisite to achieve osseointegration. So the application of a simple, clinically applicable noninvasive test to assess implant stability and osseiointegratation are considered highly desirable. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ISQ value and the insertion torque of the 3 different implant system, then to evaluate whether there was a correlation between ISQ value and insertion torque; and to determine whether implant design has an influence on either insertion torque or ISQ value. Material and method. The experiment was composed of 3 groups: depending on the implant fixture design. Group1 was Branemark type parallel implant in 3.75x7 mm. Group2 was Oneplant type straight implant in 4.3x8.5mm . Group3 was Oneplant type tapered implant in 4.3x8.5mm. Depending on the density of the bone, 2 types of bone were used in this experiment. Type I bone represented for cortical bone, type II bone represented for cancellous bone. With the insertion of the implant in type I and type II bone, the insertion torque was measured, then the ISQ value was evaluated, and then the correlation between insertion torque and ISQ value was analyzed Result and conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. Within the 3 different implants, the insertion torque value and ISQ value were higher in type I bone, when compared with type II bone.(p<0.05) 2. In type I and type II bone, Oneplant type tapered implant has the highest value in insertion torque.(p<0.05) 3. In type I and type II bone, there was no difference in ISQ values among the 3 types of implant. (p>0.05) 4. Significant linear correlation was found in type parallel implant:3.75x7mm in type II bone.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R & D Project. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Republic of Koreaen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisher대한치과보철학회en
dc.subjectImplant stabilityen
dc.subjectInsertion torqueen
dc.subjectResonance frequency analysisen
dc.subjectImplant designen
dc.titleEffect of implant designs on insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) valueen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허성주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor곽재영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한종현-
Appears in Collections:
College of Dentistry/School of Dentistry (치과대학/치의학대학원)Dept. of Dentistry (치의학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_치의학과)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse