Publications

Detailed Information

On Apples and Oranges: Structural Alignment in the Selection of Social Comparison Standards

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Mussweiler, Thomas; Gentner, Dedre

Issue Date
2007
Publisher
Institute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University
Citation
Journal of Cognitive Science, Vol.8 No.1, pp. 1-38
Keywords
structure mappingstandard selectionsimilarity hypothesissocial comparision
Abstract
The selection of social comparison standards is traditionally assumed to be guided by similarity between the self and the comparison standard. Despite the theoretical and empirical prominence of this similarity hypothesis, however, relatively little is known about the determinants of similarity in standard selection. To remedy this shortcoming we apply recent insights into the role structural alignment—a process of aligning interconnected relational structures of attributes—plays in similarity comparisons to the realm of social comparison. We propose that similarity in relational structures between individual attributes of the target and the standard critically determine which standard is selected for comparison. Consistent with this assumption, Studies 1 and 2 show that inducing a specific relational structure in participants' accessible self-knowledge leads them to select social comparison standards with similar structures. In addition, Study 3 suggests that similarity in relational structures may be a stronger determinant of standard selection than similarity in isolated features. We suggest that a consideration of structural alignment processes may lead to new insights in social comparison theory.
ISSN
1598-2327
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/70849
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share