Browse

A comparison of implant stability quotients measured using magnetic resonance frequency analysis from two directions: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jong-Chul-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun-Duck-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Soung-Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Myung-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-14T07:36:03Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-14T07:36:03Z-
dc.date.issued2010-06-
dc.identifier.citationClin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 591–597en
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/74168-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Given that the orientation of the transducer (mesiodistal or buccolingual) affects the data obtained from a piezoelectric resonance frequency analysis (RFA), this study evaluated whether it is necessary to use measurements taken in two different directions (mesiodistal and buccolingual) when using magnetic RFA to assess changes in the stiffness of dental implants. Materials and methods: A prospective clinical trial was completed, in a total of 53 patients, on 71 non-submerged dental implants that were inserted to replace the unilateral loss of mandibular molars. All of the implants were of the same diameter (4.1 mm), length (10 mm), and collar height (2.8 mm). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured during the surgical procedure, and at 4 and 10 weeks after surgery. Measurements were taken twice in each direction: in the buccolingual direction from the buccal side and in the mesiodistal direction from the mesial side. The average of two measurements in each direction was regarded as the representative ISQ of that direction. The higher and lower values of the two ISQs (buccolingual and mesiodistal) were also classified separately. In addition, the variation in ISQ was quantified by subtracting the lower value from the higher value, and the implants were classified into two groups according to this variation: one with ISQ variation of 3 or more and the other with a variation of <3. Results: There were no differences between the two ISQs when measured from different directions, but there were significant differences between the higher and lower values of the ISQs at each measurement point. A significant difference was also observed between the two ISQ variation groups in the pattern of change of the lower value for the period from immediately after surgery to 10 weeks after surgery. Conclusion: Acquisition of two directional measurements and classification of the higher and lower values of the two directional ISQs may allow clinicians to detect patterns of change in ISQ that would not be identified if only one directional measurement were made.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Korea Health R&D Project of the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea, A080863.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sonsen
dc.subjectimplant stability quotienten
dc.subjectMentor™en
dc.subjectprospective clinical studyen
dc.subjectresonance frequency analysisen
dc.titleA comparison of implant stability quotients measured using magnetic resonance frequency analysis from two directions: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing perioden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박종철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김현덕-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이종호-
Appears in Collections:
College of Dentistry/School of Dentistry (치과대학/치의학대학원)Dept. of Dentistry (치의학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_치의학과)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse