Publications

Detailed Information

Integrating independent component analysis and local outlier factor for plant-wide process monitoring

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jaeshin-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Bokyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Suk Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-01T01:44:35Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-01T01:44:35Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL; Vol.21 7; 1011-1021-
dc.identifier.issn0959-1524-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/74913-
dc.description.abstractWe propose a novel process monitoring method integrating independent component analysis (ICA) and local outlier factor (LOF). LOF is a recently developed outlier detection technique which is a density-based outlierness calculation method. In the proposed monitoring scheme, ICA transformation is performed and the control limit of LOF value is obtained based on the normal operating condition (NOC) dataset. Then, at the monitoring phase, the LOF value of current observation is computed at each monitoring time, which determines whether the current process is a fault or not. The comparison experiments are conducted with existing ICA-based monitoring schemes on widely used benchmark processes, a simple multivariate process and the Tennessee Eastman process. The proposed scheme shows the improved accuracy over existing schemes. By adopting LOF, the monitoring statistic is computed regardless of data distribution. Therefore, the proposed scheme integrating ICA and LOF is more suitable for real industry where the monitoring variables are the mixture of Gaussian and non-Gaussian variables, whereas existing ICA-based schemes assume only non-Gaussian distribution. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.subjectLocal outlier factor-
dc.subjectTennessee Eastman process-
dc.subjectProcess monitoring-
dc.subjectIndependent component analysis-
dc.subjectFault detection-
dc.subjectMultivariate statistical process control-
dc.titleIntegrating independent component analysis and local outlier factor for plant-wide process monitoring-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재신-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강보경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강석호-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.06.004-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL-
dc.description.citedreferenceGe ZQ, 2010, J PROCESS CONTR, V20, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.03.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen S, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P1169, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.008-
dc.description.citedreferenceYu JB, 2010, J PROCESS CONTR, V20, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.12.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceHsu CC, 2010, INT J PROD RES, V48, P1727, DOI 10.1080/00207540802552683-
dc.description.citedreferenceGe ZQ, 2009, J CHEMOMETR, V23, P636, DOI 10.1002/cem.1262-
dc.description.citedreferenceHSU C, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P3264-
dc.description.citedreferenceWANG H, 2009, ACTA AUTOMATICA SINI, V35, P739-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiu XQ, 2008, AICHE J, V54, P2379, DOI 10.1002/aic.11526-
dc.description.citedreferenceGaneriwal S, 2008, ACM T SENSOR NETWORK, V4, DOI 10.1145/1362542.1362546-
dc.description.citedreferenceKano M, 2008, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V32, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.07.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceDuan L, 2007, INFORM SYST, V32, P978, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2006.10.006-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JM, 2007, CAN J CHEM ENG, V85, P526-
dc.description.citedreferenceGe ZQ, 2007, IND ENG CHEM RES, V46, P2054, DOI 10.1021/ie061083g-
dc.description.citedreferenceAlbazzaz H, 2007, CHEM ENG COMMUN, V194, P218, DOI 10.1080/00986440600829739-
dc.description.citedreferencePOKRAJAC D, 2007, P IEEE S COMP INT DA, V769, P504-
dc.description.citedreferenceWang K, 2007, INT J PROD RES, V45, P5601, DOI 10.1080/00207540701325488-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JM, 2006, AICHE J, V52, P3501, DOI 10.1002/aic.10978-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho HW, 2005, INT J PROD RES, V43, P5181, DOI 10.1080/00207540500185141-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JM, 2004, J PROCESS CONTR, V14, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.09.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JM, 2004, CHEM ENG SCI, V59, P2995, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.031-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JM, 2004, CHEM ENG SCI, V59, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceJockenhovel T, 2003, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V27, P1513, DOI 10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00113-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceKano M, 2003, AICHE J, V49, P969-
dc.description.citedreferenceLAZAREVIC A, 2003, SIAM PROC S, P25-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHIANG LH, 2001, FAULT DETECTION DIAG-
dc.description.citedreferenceBreunig MM, 2000, SIGMOD REC, V29, P93-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen Q, 2000, CONTROL ENG PRACT, V8, P531-
dc.description.citedreferenceHyvarinen A, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P411-
dc.description.citedreferenceMartin EB, 1996, J PROCESS CONTR, V6, P349-
dc.description.citedreferenceKu WF, 1995, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V30, P179-
dc.description.citedreferenceDOWNS JJ, 1993, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V17, P245-
dc.description.citedreferenceKRESTA JV, 1991, CAN J CHEM ENG, V69, P35-
dc.description.tc0-
dc.identifier.wosid000294574900003-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share