Publications
Detailed Information
Constitution, National Agenda, and Presidential Leadership: Focusing on a Comparison between the Articles on Economy in the National Founding Constitution and the Post-Korean War Constitution
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, Myung Lim | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-15T03:55:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-15T03:55:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Korean Social Sciences Review(KSSR), Vol.1 No.1, pp. 263-302 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-4039 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/75203 | - |
dc.description | Translated from the published article in Korean Journal of International Relations 48(1): 429-454, 2008 with permission from the Korean Association of International Relations. | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper analyzes the dynamism among Koreas Constitution (institution), national
agenda (economic reform), and leadership (president) by comparing the 1948 National Founding Constitution (NFC), which pursued an equal economy and a market economy, with the 1954 Post-Korean War Constitution (PKWC). First, under the condition of the postcolonial agenda on land reform, the NFC promoted a socialist market economy that stipulated strong involvement by the state in the economy or an equal economic system of social democracy and not a liberal market economy. This was in line with the republican tradition that had existed since the Korean Provisional Government. Second, through the active use of the NFC, the South Korean government and President Syngman Rhee (Yi Sŭngman) executed a policy of land reform—the biggest national agenda at the time—which led to the downfall of the radical left and had a decisive influence on the expansion of farmer support for the government. The landlord class and the Korean Democratic Party were also weakened. These outcomes were a result of a combination of a key national agenda (land reform), the principles of the Constitution, and Koreas presidential leadership. Third, Koreas Constitution was transformed to promote a market economic system after the Korean War. The change in the spirit of the Constitution was due to the achievements of postcolonial reform through the success of land reform and the collapse of the left along with the emergence of a new national agenda to support postwar reconstruction and secure foreign aid. The constitutional basis for a market economy system was not laid out in the NFC but in the PKWC. Fourth, the amendment of the articles on the economy in the PKWC was done as a consequence of American demands. The US regarded the NFC as a Constitution that promoted state socialism. As a result of the socialist orientation of the NFC and Washingtons strong objection to it, a tense confrontation regarding the matters of the states role in the constitutional articles and in the economy emerged. However, due to the need to secure American aid, Korea was obliged to amend the articles on the economy to support the US-backed market economy system. Washington felt the need to block the South Korean governments excessive involvement in the economy unless it was aimed at a market economy system and tried to establish this through a constitutional amendment. Fifth, Syngman Rhee, who had been opposed to the amendment in the face of American pressure, used a strategy of exchange with regard to both Korean politics and the economy as well its power structure and economic system to ensure his third consecutive run for the presidency and to secure aid from the US. From a state development point of view, Rhees strategy was a combination of the regression of democracy, [and the] development of the market economy. Regarding the effects and consequences of the amendment, the PKWC led to a change in the Korean economic system and Koreas entry into the market economy system, an increase in American aid and changes in the aid package, the success of post-war reconstruction, and the establishment of the basis of the Korean market economy. More than anything else, the constitutional amendment heavily influenced the quantity and quality of American aid and thus provided a legal and institutional tool for Koreas postwar economic development. In addition, the constitutional amendment provided enabling conditions as well as confining conditions in the trajectory of the development of Korean society as seen in the fact that the norms and spirit of the Constitution at the time of the amendment are still maintained without fundamental changes in Korea even today. Through a comparison of the NFC and the PKWC, the success in mutual correspondence and relational dynamics among South Koreas early national agenda, the Constitution, and national leadership is clearly shown. In other words, there is a very strong correlation among the national agendas as regards land reform and post-war reconstruction, the principle and articles of the Constitution, and Korean leadership. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Center for Social Sciences, Seoul National University | - |
dc.subject | National Agenda | - |
dc.subject | Constitutional Change | - |
dc.subject | Presidential Leadership | - |
dc.subject | American Influence | - |
dc.subject | National Founding Constitution | - |
dc.subject | Post-Korean War Constitutio | - |
dc.title | Constitution, National Agenda, and Presidential Leadership: Focusing on a Comparison between the Articles on Economy in the National Founding Constitution and the Post-Korean War Constitution | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 박명림 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | Korean Social Sciences Review(KSSR) | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 302 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 263-302 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 263 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 1 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.