Browse

19세기 조선의 출판문화 - 관찬서(官撰書)의 간행을 중심으로
The Culture of Publication in Joseon in the 19th century - Study of the books published by the government

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
정재훈
Issue Date
2011-06
Publisher
서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
Citation
한국문화, Vol.54, pp. 131-152
Keywords
19世紀朝鮮官撰書外交 書籍國朝大學衍義近思續錄19th centuryJoseonbooks published by the governmentdiplomatic documents and manualsGakjo Daehak Yeon’euiGeunsa-sok’rok
Abstract
종래 조선의 역사에서 19세기는 세도정치기 쇠퇴기로 보는 것이 일반적인 사각이고 아직 그러한 시각에 큰 변화는 없는 듯하다. 하지만 18세기까지 나름의 문제 해결력을 지니고 있었던 조선사회가 19세기로 들어서며, 급전직하한 것 같은 인상을 남긴 데에는 무엇인가 해명하지 않을 수 없는 역사적인 사실이 존재한다고 할 수있다.

왜 19세기는 신속하게 몰락의 나락으로 빠져들었는지 아니면 다른 현상이 었었는지에 대해 이글에서는 지식을 다루는 출판문화의 방면, 특히 官擺書의 刊行을 중심으로 살펴보려고 한다. 書籍은 당대의 정보가 집합되어 결정화된 것이며, 따라서 그 出版의 추이나 내용을 살핀다면 당대 지식의 양과 질에 대해서 추론할 수 있는 근거를 확보하게 될 것이다. 대체로 지식이나 정보의 수집과 간행은 책을 통해 이루어진다. 정보의 수입과 집적은 어떻게 이루어졌는지, 서적의 간행은 어떻게 이루어지고, 무엇이 간행되었는지 확인해 볼 필요가 있겠다.

In this article, the culture of publication that prevailed in the 19th century Joseon will be examined, by studying some books published by the government. It was not an easy job to come up with a responsible claim, that there have indeed been some problems in the scholars’ perspective viewing the history of the 19th century, especially in terms of the publication culture of the time. Compared to the 18th century, when publication was a highly invigorated practice, and the government was more than eager to produce books that would reflect the information and knowledge accumulated at the time, publication was interestingly showing somewhat of a downfall, in the 19th century. And even the books that were published, were mere reiterations of what people were already aware of, the general knowledge of Neo-Confucian, which was no longer able to provide solutions for the people and the era.

Yet at the same time, some of the nobility houses located in the capital region were starting to exhibit some ‘highly decorated’ publications(at least in their exteriors), by using personally created printing blocks, or publishing personal anthologies before one even died. And under the influence of the Chinese Qing culture, not only paper, but also document formats of China were imported from the outside as well. The state’s capability of accumulating and processing information was indeed deteriorating, yet the capital aristocracy class was more actively engaging themselves in private and “high-class” publication, thus creating a new kind of ‘publication culture.’

The government at the time did try to expand its windows for the absorption of information, especially not only from China but also from Japan, and official publication concerning diplomatic relationships with other countries in the world actually increased, as contacts with those countries were being subsequently made. Yet it should also be noted that such phenomena was accompanied by another trend of publication mentioned above, which was concentrated too much upon publishing books related to Chinese classics(經書) and ritual protocols(禮書).

With the publication increase since the 17th century, and even with the temporary decline in the 19th century, publication was still serving as a method of distribution, for knowledge and information. Knowledge was spreaded throughout the public, information became more and more secularized, and people started to own those knowledge as ‘the knowledge of the Joseon people(朝鮮化).’ Not only the nobility houses, but also people of the commoner class, started to generally practice Confucian-style memorial services, and some of them even tried to officialize themselves as descendants of some Yangban houses, by committing forgeries to existing genealogical records of certain prominent lineages. Publication was no longer the sole privilege of the upper class.

Even the people who pursued the preservation of orthodox Neo-Confucianism attempted to adapt their learning to the Joseon condition. 『Gukjo Daehak Yeon’eui/國朝大學衍義』 was a book that replaced all the Chinese episodes originally inserted in 『Daehak Yeon’eui/大學衍義(published to enlighten the emperors)』, with ‘Joseon episodes.’ And 『Geunsa-sok’rok/近思續錄』 was a book that replaced the ‘Five Masters of the Northern Sung period’ originally described in 『Geunsa-rok/近思錄(the primary manual of Neo-Confucianism)』, with ‘Joseon’ Confucian scholars. Joseon was now able to provide its own citizens with historical knowledge and solutions for current dilemmas.
ISSN
1226-8356
Language
Korean
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/75728
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies (규장각한국학연구원)Korean Culture (한국문화) Korean Culture (한국문화) vol.53/56 (2011)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse