Publications

Detailed Information

Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Woo Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Young Soo-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Jin-Hyeok-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Hyub-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Sung-Gwon-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Ji Kon-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Yong Bum-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Chang Jin-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-23T06:49:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-23T06:49:39Z-
dc.date.issued2009-01-
dc.identifier.citationGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; Vol.69 1; 55-62ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0016-5107-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76331-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) is widely used for the palliation of cholestasis in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, little is known about which is the better option in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. We compared the clinical outcomes of these 2 methods of biliary decompression in these patients. Design and Setting: Multicenter retrospective study. Patients: A total of 85 patients with newly diagnosed advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth III or BisMuth IV) and who did not receive an operation, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-four of the 85 received endoscopic SEMS and 41 received percutaneous SEMS. Interventions: Endoscopic SEMS or percutaneous SEMS. Main Outcome Measurements and Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups, but the rate Of Successful biliary decompression was significantly higher in the percutaneous SEMS group than in the endoscopic SEMS group (92.7% vs 77.3%, respectively, P = .049). Overall rates of procedure-related complications were similar for the 2 groups, but 1 death (from biliary sepsis) occurred in the endoscopic SEMS group. Median survival of patients in whom biliary drainage was Successful initially, regardless of which procedure was performed, was Much longer than that of patients who had failed biliary drainage (8.7 months vs 1.8 months, respectively, P < .001). Once successful biliary decompression had been achieved, median survival and stent patency duration were similar in the 2 study groups. Limitation: Retrospective study Conclusions: Percutaneous SEMS may be chosen for initial biliary drainage in patients with advanced type ill or W hilar cholangiocarcinoma, given higher initial success rate and low level Of procedure-related cholangids. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:55-62.)ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERko_KR
dc.titlePalliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approachko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor백우현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박영수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor황진혁-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이상협-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤창진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강성권-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류지곤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤용범-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용태-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.005-
dc.citation.journaltitleGASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY-
dc.description.citedreferenceConnor S, 2007, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V33, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceBrountzos EN, 2007, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V30, P66, DOI 10.1007/s00270-005-0379-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceYoshida H, 2006, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V12, P2423-
dc.description.citedreferenceArvanitakis M, 2006, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V53, P21-
dc.description.citedreferenceMansfield SD, 2005, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V11, P7625-
dc.description.citedreferenceRerknimitr R, 2004, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V38, P518-
dc.description.citedreferenceInal M, 2003, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V14, P1409, DOI 10.1097/01.RVI.0000096762.74047.A6-
dc.description.citedreferenceFreeman ML, 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, P41, DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.292-
dc.description.citedreferenceDe Palma GD, 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, P50, DOI 10.1067/mge.2003.310-
dc.description.citedreferenceCheng JLS, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P33, DOI 10.1067/mge.2002.125364-
dc.description.citedreferenceBYRNES V, 2002, CURR TREAT OPTIONS G, V5, P87-
dc.description.citedreferenceDe Palma GD, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V53, P547-
dc.description.citedreferenceGerhards MF, 2001, EUR J SURG, V167, P274-
dc.description.citedreferenceCowling MG, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P355-
dc.description.citedreferenceTIBBLE JA, 2001, J HEPATO-BILIARY-PAN, V8, P118-
dc.description.citedreferenceJAMAGIN WR, 2001, ANN SURG, V234, P507-
dc.description.citedreferenceBorn P, 2000, Z GASTROENTEROL, V38, P483-
dc.description.citedreferenceChamberlain RS, 2000, ANN SURG ONCOL, V7, P55-
dc.description.citedreferenceChang WH, 1998, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V47, P354-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiu CL, 1998, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V133, P293-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee BH, 1997, AM J ROENTGENOL, V168, P741-
dc.description.citedreferencePeters RA, 1997, ENDOSCOPY, V29, P10-
dc.description.citedreferenceNakeeb A, 1996, ANN SURG, V224, P463-
dc.description.citedreferenceNORDBACK IH, 1994, SURGERY, V115, P597-
dc.description.citedreferenceKNYRIM K, 1993, ENDOSCOPY, V25, P207-
dc.description.citedreferenceWAGNER HJ, 1993, ENDOSCOPY, V25, P213-
dc.description.citedreferenceSTOKER J, 1993, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V39, P43-
dc.description.citedreferenceDAVIDS PHP, 1992, LANCET, V340, P1488-
dc.description.citedreferenceKADAKIA SC, 1992, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V38, P454-
dc.description.citedreferenceSPEER AG, 1988, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V34, P412-
dc.description.citedreferenceDEVIERE J, 1988, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V34, P95-
dc.description.citedreferenceBISMUTH H, 1988, WORLD J SURG, V12, P39-
dc.description.citedreferenceSPEER AG, 1987, LANCET, V2, P57-
dc.description.citedreferenceJUTTIJUDATA P, 1984, AM J SURG, V147, P360-
dc.description.citedreferenceKLATSKIN G, 1965, AM J MED, V38, P241-
dc.description.tc25-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share