서울대학교 중앙도서관
S-Space 소개
My S-Space
로그인이 필요합니다.
Login

S-Space

Publications

Detailed Information

Clinical Efficacy of Highly Purified hMG versus Recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Meta-Analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJee, Byung Chul-
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Chang Suk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong Beom-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seok Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Shin Yong-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-05T02:09:12Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-05T02:09:12Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationGYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION; Vol.70 2; 132-137ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0378-7346-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/76832-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: To compare the effectiveness of highly purified hMG (Menopur) with recombinant FSH (Gonal-F) in IVF/ICSI patients who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with pituitary suppression. Methods: A literature search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Medline and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed using the key words `highly purified hMG` and `recombinant FSH.` Only prospective randomized controlled trials were included when they compared IVF/ICSI outcomes after administration of Menopur versus Gonal-F. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy/live birth. Results: Ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96-1.26) or per embryo transfer (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99-1.29), as well as live birth rate per embryo transfer (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33), is similar between the Menopur and the Gonal-F group. Conclusion: The combined data presented in this meta-analysis do not support a clinical superiority of Gonal-F over Menopur. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Baselko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherKARGERko_KR
dc.subjectHighly purified hMGko_KR
dc.subjectMeta-analysisko_KR
dc.subjectPregnancy rateko_KR
dc.subjectRecombinant FSHko_KR
dc.subjectIVFko_KR
dc.titleClinical Efficacy of Highly Purified hMG versus Recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Meta-Analysisko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor지병철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서창석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용범-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김석현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문신용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000308458-
dc.citation.journaltitleGYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION-
dc.description.citedreferenceWechowski J, 2009, FERTIL STERIL, V91, P1067, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.034-
dc.description.citedreferenceAl-Inany HG, 2009, GYNECOL ENDOCRINOL, V25, P372, DOI 10.1080/09513590802630120-
dc.description.citedreferenceBosch E, 2008, HUM REPROD, V23, P2346, DOI 10.1093/humrep/den220-
dc.description.citedreferencePlatteau P, 2008, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V17, P190-
dc.description.citedreferenceHompes PGA, 2008, FERTIL STERIL, V89, P1685, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.039-
dc.description.citedreferenceCoomarasamy A, 2008, HUM REPROD, V23, P310, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dem305-
dc.description.citedreferenceAl-Inany HG, 2008, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V16, P81-
dc.description.citedreferenceWechowski J, 2007, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V15, P500-
dc.description.citedreferenceZiebe S, 2007, HUM REPROD, V22, P2404, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dem221-
dc.description.citedreferenceSmitz J, 2007, HUM REPROD, V22, P676, DOI 10.1093/humrep/del445-
dc.description.citedreferenceAndersen AN, 2006, HUM REPROD, V21, P3217, DOI 10.1093/humrep/del284-
dc.description.citedreferenceKolibianakis EM, 2006, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V12, P3, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmi030-
dc.description.citedreferenceWolfenson C, 2005, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V10, P442-
dc.description.citedreferenceAl-Inany H, 2005, GYNECOL ENDOCRINOL, V20, P161, DOI 10.1080/09513590400027232-
dc.description.citedreferenceLisi F, 2005, FERTIL STERIL, V83, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.fernstert.2004.07.969-
dc.description.citedreferencePlatteau P, 2004, FERTIL STERIL, V81, P1401, DOI 10.1016/j,fertnstert.2003.09.077-
dc.description.citedreferenceLloyd A, 2003, FERTIL STERIL, V80, P1108, DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02185-X-
dc.description.citedreferenceKilani Z, 2003, HUM REPROD, V18, P1194, DOI 10.1093/humrep/deg252-
dc.description.citedreferenceAl-Inany H, 2003, HUM REPROD, V18, P305-
dc.description.citedreferenceYong PYK, 2003, FERTIL STERIL, V79, P308-
dc.description.citedreferenceWESTERGAARD LG, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1-
dc.description.citedreferenceDiedrich K, 2002, FERTIL STERIL, V78, P520-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarlin J, 2000, HUM REPROD, V15, P239-
dc.description.citedreferenceBrinsden P, 2000, FERTIL STERIL, V73, P114-
dc.description.citedreferenceTulppala M, 1999, HUM REPROD, V14, P2709-
dc.description.citedreferenceDaya S, 1999, HUM REPROD, V14, P2207-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

Show Simple Item Record
Find it @ SNU

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share

qrcode
SNS Share