Publications

Detailed Information

Non-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention decline

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKang, Eun Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorBaek, Min Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, SangYun-
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Nam-Jong-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-18T06:31:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-18T06:31:37Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationRESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE; Vol.27 6; 647-652ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0922-6028-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77134-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Attention decline after stroke is common and hampers the rehabilitation process, and non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential to elicit behavioral changes by modulating cortical excitability. The authors tested the hypothesis that a single session of non-invasive cortical stimulation with excitatory anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can improve attention in stroke patients. Methods: Ten patients with post-stroke cognitive decline (MMSE <= 25) and 10 age-matched healthy controls participated in this double blind, sham-controlled, crossover study involving the administration of real (2 mA for 20 min) or sham stimulation (2 mA for 1 min) to the left DLPFC. Attention was measured using a computerized Go/No-Go test before and after intervention. Improvements in accuracy and speed after stimulation relative to baseline were compared for real and sham stimulations. Results: In healthy controls, no significant improvement in Go/No-Go test was observed after either real or sham stimulation. However, in stroke patients, tDCS led to a significant improvement in response accuracy at 1 hour post-stimulation relative to baseline, and this improvement was maintained until 3 hours post-stimulation (P < 0.05), whereas sham stimulation did not lead to a significant improvement in response accuracy (P > 0.05). Changes in reaction times were comparable for the two stimulations (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Non invasive anodal tDCS applied to the left DLPFC was found to improve attention versus sham stimulation in stroke patients, which suggests that non-invasive cortical intervention could potentially be used during rehabilitative training to improve attention.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a grant from
Seoul National University College of Medicine (Grant
No. 800-20060236) to N.J. Paik, and by a grant from
the Korean Geriatric Society to E.K. Kang.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherIOS PRESSko_KR
dc.subjectAttentionko_KR
dc.subjectcognitionko_KR
dc.subjectcortical stimulationko_KR
dc.subjecttDCSko_KR
dc.subjectstrokeko_KR
dc.titleNon-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention declineko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강은경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor백민재-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김상윤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor백남종-
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/RNN-2009-0514-
dc.citation.journaltitleRESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE-
dc.description.citedreferenceMonti A, 2008, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V79, P451, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277-
dc.description.citedreferencePriori A, 2008, CEREB CORTEX, V18, P451, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhm088-
dc.description.citedreferenceKuo MF, 2008, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V46, P2122, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.023-
dc.description.citedreferenceCoulthard E, 2006, CURR OPIN NEUROL, V19, P613-
dc.description.citedreferenceBoggio PS, 2006, J NEUROL SCI, V249, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062-
dc.description.citedreferenceGandiga PC, 2006, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V117, P845, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceFregni F, 2005, EXP BRAIN RES, V166, P23, DOI 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceHummel F, 2005, BRAIN, V128, P490, DOI 10.1093/brain/awh369-
dc.description.citedreferenceDEVINSKY O, 2004, NEUROLOGY COGNITIVE-
dc.description.citedreferenceNitsche MA, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P619, DOI 10.1162/089892903321662994-
dc.description.citedreferenceMcDowd JM, 2003, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V58, pP45-
dc.description.citedreferenceHikosaka O, 2002, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V12, P217-
dc.description.citedreferenceAranda D, 2001, REV NEUROLOGIA, V32, P10-
dc.description.citedreferenceNitsche MA, 2000, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V527, P633-
dc.description.citedreferenceMcNevin NH, 2000, PHYS THER, V80, P373-
dc.description.citedreferenceDESPOSITO M, 1998, BRAIN RES COGN BRAIN, V7, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceTATEMICHI TK, 1994, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V57, P202-
dc.description.tc7-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share