Browse

Interpretations of the Clinical Outcomes of the Nonresponders to Mail Surveys in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Sae Kwang-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Yeon Gwi-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chong Bum-
dc.contributor.authorSung, Sang Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Kyun-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-04T07:19:57Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-04T07:19:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY; Vol.25(1); 133-137ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0883-5403-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/78457-
dc.description.abstractThis study examined whether or not nonresponders to mail survey have poorer clinical outcomes than responders. A postal questionnaire, which was designed to evaluate the functional disability and patient`s satisfaction, was mailed to 387 patients whose 1-year clinical outcomes were available. Of the 270 patients (69.8%) who responded, 247 (91.4%) reported that they were satisfied with their replaced knees. The knees of the nonresponders showed significantly poorer results in terms of the function-related scales (American Knee Society score function, Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale function, Short-Form 36 physical and functional scores) than the knees of the responders, whereas there were no significant differences in the pain-related scales. The clinical results of the nonresponders were poorer in most of the clinical outcome scales than those of the satisfied subgroup of responders but better than those of the dissatisfied subgroup. The results of the pain-related scales were similar to the satisfied subgroup but the function-related scales were similar to the dissatisfied subgroup.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherCHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERSko_KR
dc.subjectclinical outcomesko_KR
dc.subjecttotal knee arthroplastyko_KR
dc.subjectnonrespondersko_KR
dc.subjectmail surveysko_KR
dc.titleInterpretations of the Clinical Outcomes of the Nonresponders to Mail Surveys in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplastyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor권새광-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강연기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장종범-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor성상철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태균-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.004-
dc.citation.journaltitleJOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY-
dc.description.citedreferenceMarx RG, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V87A, P1999, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.D.02286-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim J, 2004, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V86A, P15-
dc.description.citedreferenceLudemann R, 2003, AM J SURG, V186, P143, DOI 10.1016/S002-9610(03)00175-2-
dc.description.citedreferenceJoshi AB, 2003, J ARTHROPLASTY, V18, P149, DOI 10.1054/arth.2003.50061-
dc.description.citedreferenceEdwards P, 2002, BRIT MED J, V324, P1183-
dc.description.citedreferenceFowler FJ, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P190-
dc.description.citedreferenceRobertsson O, 2001, J ARTHROPLASTY, V16, P476-
dc.description.citedreferenceDunbar MJ, 2001, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V83B, P339-
dc.description.citedreferenceNorquist BM, 2000, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V82A, P838-
dc.description.citedreferenceSethuraman V, 2000, J ARTHROPLASTY, V15, P183-
dc.description.citedreferenceAsch DA, 1997, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V50, P1129-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCHORNEY CA, 1994, MED CARE, V32, P551-
dc.description.citedreferenceWARE JE, 1992, MED CARE, V30, P473-
dc.description.citedreferenceINSALL JN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P13-
dc.description.citedreferenceBELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833-
dc.description.tc0-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_정형외과학전공)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse