Publications

Detailed Information

Effect of implant drill characteristics on heat generation in osteotomy sites: A pilot study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, Hyun Jun-
dc.contributor.authorWikesjo, Ulf ME-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Ho-Seong-
dc.contributor.authorKu, Young-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Ki-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorEom, Tae-Gwan-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-22T05:08:43Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-22T05:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, Vol.22, No.7, pp.722-726ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/80954-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drill-bone contact area on bone temperature during osteotomy preparation. Material and methods: Conventional triflute Ø3.6mm drills were modified with the intent to reduce frictional heat induction. The peripheral dimensions of the drill were reduced 0.15, 0.35 and 0.5mm to evaluate the effect of surface area on induction of frictional heat between the drill and bone/cutting debris (parameter A). Also, the lateral cutting surface of the drill was set to 0.1, 2 and 7.5mm to estimate heat induced by direct function of the drill (parameter B). A non-modified triflute drill (parameter A: 0mm; parameter B: 15mm) served as control. Thus, nine drills with different A/B combinations vs. one control were tested in artificial bone. Real-time temperature changes (during drilling and withdrawing) were assessed using an infrared thermal imager. Each drilling procedure was performed up to 20 times. Thermal image data were transferred to a PC for simultaneous analysis. Results: Mean temperature changes for all modified drill combinations were smaller than for the control (P<0.001). The effects of parameters A and B were statistically significant (P<0.001). There was a significant interaction effect between the two parameters (P<0.001) showing that the effect of parameter A on the mean temperature changes is different depending on the values of parameter B. As the dimensions of parameter B decreased, the temperature change during drilling also decreased. However, a tendency for the temperature to increase or decrease by parameter A was not observed. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this pilot study, the observations herein suggest that reduction in contact area between the drill and bone reduces heat induction. Further studies to optimize drill/bone contact dimensions are needed. (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipOur special thanks to Osstem Implant Inc., Busan, Korea for manufacturing the postulated drills that were used in this study.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sonsko_KR
dc.subjectFrictional heatko_KR
dc.subjectImplant drill designko_KR
dc.subjectSurface contact areako_KR
dc.titleEffect of implant drill characteristics on heat generation in osteotomy sites: A pilot studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오현준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강호성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구기태-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor엄태관-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02051.x-
dc.citation.journaltitleClinical Oral Implants Research-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share