Publications

Detailed Information

Periodontal regeneration capacity of equine particulate bone in canine alveolar bone defects

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae-Il-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Chong-Pyoung-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Min-Suk-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yoon-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorRhee, Sang-Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-23T08:09:52Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-23T08:09:52Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science, Vol.40, No.5, pp.220-226ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn2093-2278-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/81056-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study was performed to evaluate the periodontal wound healing effect of particulate equine bone mineral on canine alveolar bone defects. Methods: Twelve adult male beagle dogs were used as study subjects. The mandibular second and fourth premolars were extracted prior to the experimental surgery, and the extraction sites were allowed to heal for 8 weeks. After periodontal probing, two-walled defects were created at the mesial and distal sides of the mandibular third premolars bilaterally, and the defects were filled with equine particulate bone with collagen membrane or bovine particulate bone with collagen membrane, or collagen membrane alone. The defects without any treatment served as negative controls. After probing depth measurement, animals were sacrificed at 10, 16, and 24 post-surgery weeks for micro-computed tomographic and histomorphometric analysis. Results: The equine particulate bone-inserted group showed significantly decreased values of probing depth and first bone contact compared to the negative control and collagen membrane alone groups at weeks 10, 16, and 24 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the new cementum length, newly-formed bone area, or newly-formed bone volume between equine particulate bone- and bovine particulate bone-inserted groups, both of which showed significantly increased values compared to the negative control and collagen membrane alone groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Equine particulate bone showed significant differences in probing depth, first bone contact, new cementum length, newly formed bone area, and bone volume fraction values when compared to the negative control and collagen membrane alone groups. There were no significant differences between equine and bovine particulate bone substitutes in these parameters; therefore, we can conclude that equine particulate bone is equivalent to bovine bone for periodontal regeneration. (C) 2010 Korean Academy of Periodontology.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherKorean Academy of Periodontologyko_KR
dc.subjectBone substitutesko_KR
dc.subjectPeriodontal bone lossko_KR
dc.subjectHeterologous transplantationko_KR
dc.subjectMicrocomputed tomographyko_KR
dc.titlePeriodontal regeneration capacity of equine particulate bone in canine alveolar bone defectsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태일-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정종평-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허민석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박윤정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이상훈-
dc.identifier.doi10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.220-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science-
dc.description.tc1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share