Browse

Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1-C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.

Cited 46 time in Web of Science Cited 54 time in Scopus
Authors
Yeom, Jin S.; Buchowski, Jacob M.; Kim, Ho-Joong; Chang, Bong-Soon; Lee, Choon-Ki; Riew, K. Daniel
Issue Date
2013-07
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Citation
The Spine Journal Vol.13 No.7, pp. 775-785
Keywords
의약학C2 pedicle screwC1–C2 transarticular screwVertebral artery injuryHigh-riding vertebral arteryNarrow C2 pedicle
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: To our knowledge, no large series comparing the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1-C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw have been published. In addition, no comparative studies have been performed on those with a high-riding vertebral artery and/or a narrow pedicle who are thought to be at higher risk than those with normal anatomy.PURPOSE: To compare the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1-C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw in an overall patient population and subsets of patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and a narrow pedicle using computed tomography (CT) scan images and three-dimensional (3D) screw trajectory software.STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic analysis using CT scans.PATIENT SAMPLE: Computed tomography scans of 269 consecutive patients, for a total of 538 potential screw insertion sites for each type of screw.OUTCOME MEASURES: Cortical perforation into the vertebral artery groove of C2 by a screw.METHODS: We simulated the placement of 4.0 mm transarticular and pedicle screws using 1-mm-sliced CT scans and 3D screw trajectory software. We then compared the frequency of C2 vertebral artery groove violation by the two different fixation methods. This was done in the overall patient population, in the subset of those with a high-riding vertebral artery (defined as an isthmus height ≤5 mm or internal height ≤2 mm on sagittal images) and with a narrow pedicle (defined as a pedicle width ≤4 mm on axial images).RESULTS: There were 78 high-riding vertebral arteries (14.5%) and 51 narrow pedicles (9.5%). Most (82%) of the narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery, whereas only 54% of the high-riding vertebral arteries had a concurrent narrow pedicle. Overall, 9.5% of transarticular and 8.0% of pedicle screws violated the C2 vertebral artery groove without a significant difference between the two types of screws (p=.17). Among those with a high-riding vertebral artery, vertebral artery groove violation was significantly lower (p=.02) with pedicle (49%) than with transarticular (63%) screws. Among those with a narrow pedicle, vertebral artery groove violation was high in both groups (71% with transarticular and 76% with pedicle screws) but without a significant difference between the two groups (p=.55).CONCLUSIONS: Overall, neither technique has more inherent anatomic risk of vertebral artery injury. However, in the presence of a high-riding vertebral artery, placement of a pedicle screw is significantly safer than the placement of a transarticular screw. Narrow pedicles, which might be anticipated to lead to higher risk for a pedicle screw than a transarticular screw, did not result in a significant difference because most patients (82%) with narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery that also increased the risk with a transarticular screw. Except in case of a high-riding vertebral artery, our results suggest that the surgeon can opt for either technique and expect similar anatomic risks of vertebral artery injury.
ISSN
1529-9430
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/83378
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.005
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_정형외과학전공)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse