Publications

Detailed Information

Priority in Insolvency Proceedings

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, SooGeun-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Heejong-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-06T07:09:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-06T07:09:25Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Korean Law, Vol.7 No.2, pp. 283-331-
dc.identifier.issn1598-1681-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85133-
dc.description.abstractInsolvency unveils the genuine virtue of the concept of priority. Attempts, however, have

proved that the task of arranging relevant claims in a single line of order according to their

priority is quite difficult and complicated in insolvency proceedings. The reason lies in the fact

that the concept of priority contains three factors; time, amount and method of collection. In

standard non-insolvency compulsory executions, the priority structure affords certain claims to

clearly precede others in time and amount. In this case, the superior creditor is entitled to be paid

in full before and to the exclusion of other junior creditors. There is no other method of collection.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBK 21 law-
dc.subjectpriority-
dc.subjectinsolvency-
dc.subjectrehabilitation-
dc.subjectbankruptcy-
dc.titlePriority in Insolvency Proceedings-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Korean Law-
dc.citation.endpage331-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages283-331-
dc.citation.startpage283-
dc.citation.volume7-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share