Browse

Conditional Forms and Meanings in Korean

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Lee, Chang-Bong
Issue Date
1994-03
Publisher
서울대학교 언어교육원
Citation
어학연구, Vol.30 No.1, pp. 273-295
Abstract
The paper aims to study the forms and meanings of two conditional markers, -myen and -tamyen, and their functional division within the Korean grammar of conditionals. I claim the following two main points. First, I argue contra Bak (1987) that -myen is not a ubiquitous conditional marker in Korean and Korean is not exceptional in its domain of conditionality; that is, the realis domain cannot be a conditional target in Korean. Second, I argue that -tamyen clause is characterized by its cleft-conditional form and this structural feature explains its felicitous use over -myen in the following contexts. One of such contexts is what Iatridou (1990) called 'Factual Conditional' type where the speaker quotes what the addressee just said in the previous discourse. The other context is where the speaker views the content of the protasis as (highly) hypothetical. We observe that the choice between -tamyen and -myen is determined by the speaker's attitude toward' the content of the protasis or in the whole conditional sentence such that -tamyen is favored over -myen to mark the unexpected or remote possibility or the unrealistic situation with a counterfactual flavor (more hypothetical), whereas -myen prevails over -tamyen when the content of the protasis is viewed as the expected or immediate possibility (less hypothetical) or when it is not characterized by being hypothetical as in Restrictive If-clause types or Generic Conditionals.
ISSN
0254-4474
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/86005
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 30 Number 1/4 (1994)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse