Publications
Detailed Information
Anaphor or Pronominal?
Cited 0 time in
Web of Science
Cited 0 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 1996-12
- Publisher
- 서울대학교 언어교육원
- Citation
- 어학연구, Vol.32 No.4, pp. 621-636
- Abstract
- This paper examines the Korean caki and the Japanese zibun to determine
whether they are anaphors or pronominals, applying the following
three tests: (i) split antecedence; (ii) strict identity reading under VP ellipsis;
(iii) disjoint reference effect. Interpretation of the plural markers,
Korean tul and Japanese tati indicates that the split antecedence of cakitul
and zibun-tati cannot be attributed to pronominal properties of caki and
zibun, but to the property of the plural morphologies tul and tati,
respectively. Furthermore, the impossibility of a strict identity reading
under VP ellipsis supports the analysis that they are not referential pronouns.
It is also shown that their non-adherence to anti-locality condition
excludes the possibility that they are bound pronouns or referential pronouns,
supporting the claim that they are anaphors.
- ISSN
- 0254-4474
- Language
- English
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.