Publications

Detailed Information

The Case for Split Unaccusativity Hypothesis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, Sangsuk-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.41 No.1, pp. 179-208ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/86350-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to review the previous treatments of English unaccusative verbs in English syntactic theories and to propose a new hypothesis, in which the conventional unaccusatives should be split into unaccusatives proper (i.e., unaccusatives) and unaccusative hybrids (i.e., ergatives). To make a case for the split unaccusativity hypothesis, ergatives are redefined in terms of four syntactic and semantic properties, and supporting evidence from the areas of syntax, lexical semantics, and psycholinguistics is presented. The projected theoretical relevance is that the separate treatment of unaccusatives and ergatives will help to resolve some issues in the puzzle of unaccusatives and mismatches, as well as contribute to highlighting the interface between syntax and semantics in explaining linguistic phenomena.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.subjectunaccusativeko_KR
dc.subjectergativeko_KR
dc.subjectunaccusativityko_KR
dc.subjectergativityko_KR
dc.subjectsyntaxko_KR
dc.subjectergative verbsko_KR
dc.subjectunaccusative verbsko_KR
dc.subjectsplit unaccusativity hypothesisko_KR
dc.titleThe Case for Split Unaccusativity Hypothesisko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share