Publications
Detailed Information
The Case for Split Unaccusativity Hypothesis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Sangsuk | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-07T07:53:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T07:53:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.41 No.1, pp. 179-208 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/86350 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this paper is to review the previous treatments of English unaccusative verbs in English syntactic theories and to propose a new hypothesis, in which the conventional unaccusatives should be split into unaccusatives proper (i.e., unaccusatives) and unaccusative hybrids (i.e., ergatives). To make a case for the split unaccusativity hypothesis, ergatives are redefined in terms of four syntactic and semantic properties, and supporting evidence from the areas of syntax, lexical semantics, and psycholinguistics is presented. The projected theoretical relevance is that the separate treatment of unaccusatives and ergatives will help to resolve some issues in the puzzle of unaccusatives and mismatches, as well as contribute to highlighting the interface between syntax and semantics in explaining linguistic phenomena. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
dc.subject | unaccusative | ko_KR |
dc.subject | ergative | ko_KR |
dc.subject | unaccusativity | ko_KR |
dc.subject | ergativity | ko_KR |
dc.subject | syntax | ko_KR |
dc.subject | ergative verbs | ko_KR |
dc.subject | unaccusative verbs | ko_KR |
dc.subject | split unaccusativity hypothesis | ko_KR |
dc.title | The Case for Split Unaccusativity Hypothesis | ko_KR |
dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 어학연구 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.