S-Space College of Humanities (인문대학) Institute for Russian, East European & Eurasian Studies (러시아문화권연구소) 러시아연구 (Russian Studies) 러시아연구 Volume 22 Number 1/2 (2012)
러시아어 등위접속 연구: 동반구문과 и접속 및 제로접속과의 비교를 중심으로
A study on Coordination in Russian - Comparison among Comitative, Zero Coordination and I Coordination
- Issue Date
- 서울대학교 러시아연구소
- 러시아연구, Vol.22 No.1, pp. 21-42
- The study investigates the relationship among the zero strategy, and strategy and with strategy which are realized syntactically through enumeration of items, i coordinaton and comitative construction. It tried to show their complementary distribution, semantic and pragmatic characteristics based on syntactic peculiarities. In the case of coordination of two arguments, comitative constructions and i coordination show complementary distribution. In this case, i coordination has two properties - equivalence and independence, in the meanwhile comitative constructions have other two opposite properties - inequivalence, and dependence. Sometimes, according to the semantic characteristics of the situations or actions, the selection between i coordination and comitative constructions. In the case of coordination of two and/or arguments, i coordinations and enumeration show complementary distribution. i coordination has an exhaustive reading which compose closed set of arguments, in the meanwhile enumeration composes open set and imply that the speech has not been completed by speaker and more items can be added to the list. In i coordination, the last argument right before conjunction i is usually the least salient one in speaker`s cognition in that it comes into his head, and activates for the last time.
- Files in This Item: