Publications
Detailed Information
한국의 민주화에 있어서 헌법재판소와 권력 통제 -1988년부터 1998년까지- : The Democratization of South Korea and Power Control by the Constitutional Court
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정종섭 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-09T02:44:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-09T02:44:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.42 No.1, pp. 61-106 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9015 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article aims at evaluating the degree of Constitutional Court's
contribution in the realization of its power control for the first decade(1988-1998). It is a serial work to my earlier article, The Democratization of South Korea and the Contribution of the Constitutional Court:1988-1998(Seoul Law Journal Vol. 40 No. 3), where I analysed how much the Court contributed in the realization of people's constitutional rights for the same period. It is important to review how sufficiently the Court controled each subdivision of the powers: the legislative power, military power, National Information Agency, public prosecution, presidential actions, administrative actions, judiciary, local autonomy in public power control. In judicial review, the Court declared about 150 legislative acts unconstitutional. In doing so, the Court reviewed the process of legislation, reduced the range of military secrets. Most characteristically, the Court reviewed the constitutionality of the nolle prosequi decisions of the prosecution. The Court declared 63 decisions unconstitutional for the infringement of the constitutional rights. It might seem unnatural for the Court to control the non-prosecutorial power through the constitutional litigation process. However the Court can efficiently controls the non-prosecutorial power through the constitutional litigation process. Of course, this kind of control is exceptional. The Court also reviewed the Presidential actions and administrative decisions. Normally these kinds of action are controlled by the ordinary court with administrative litigation process. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 글은 韓國과 日本國의 法學者에 의한 兩國의 법에 대한 比較硏究의 韓․日
공동프로젝트의 한 주제로 작성되었다. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 한국의 민주화의 과정 | - |
dc.subject | 헌법재판은 권력통제의 기능 | - |
dc.subject | 권력통제 | - |
dc.title | 한국의 민주화에 있어서 헌법재판소와 권력 통제 -1988년부터 1998년까지- | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Democratization of South Korea and Power Control by the Constitutional Court | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Jeong, Jong Seob | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 106 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 61-106 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 61 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 42 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.