Browse

A Comparative Study between English and Korean Resultative Constructions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong-Bok-
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-06T06:10:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-02-06T06:10:36Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.35 No.1, pp. 57-90ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/90815-
dc.description.abstractEnglish resultative phrases have been known to appear in limited environments. Two prevailing approaches to capture such limited distribution have been the Affected Theme Restriction (cf. Goldberg 1995) and the Direct Object Restriction built upon the Unaccusative Hypothesis (cf. Simpson 1983). This paper challenges both of these, especially for the explanation of Korean resultative constructions. In particular, this paper, by adopting the basic idea of Weschler's 0997, 1998), shows that the distinction between raising and equi verbs is enough to predict (English as well as Korean) resultative constructions. This distinction, combined with a lexical rule that freely introduces a resultative phrase, predicts the differences between the two languages as well as the flexibility of Korean resultative constructions, for example, allowing the resultative phrase to predicate an agentive subject or an argument rather than theme or patient.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleA Comparative Study between English and Korean Resultative Constructionsko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 35 Number 1/4 (1999)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse