Browse

Agree to Move?

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Lee, Hong Bae
Issue Date
1999
Publisher
서울대학교 언어교육원
Citation
어학연구, Vol.35 No.4, pp. 523-541
Abstract
In Chomsky (1998), Move is defined as a composite operation consisting of three components: Agree, Identify and Merge. I will argue that the definition of Move as a composite syntactic operation cannot be maintained. In particular, I will claim that, as there is no composite transformation such as Passivization, there is no composite operation like Move as defined in Chomsky (1998). I will also argue that his definition of Move may give rise to a serious "look-ahead" problem. Furthermore, I will show that his Activization hypothesis that only the expression with an uninterpretable feature is accessible to syntactic operations leads us to make an ad hoc assumption that the expletive there merged to SPEC-T is an X° head. The present paper will present reasons why the operation Agree allows a probe to skip the expletive there in searching for its goal, whereas Move must raise the expletive located closer to the probe. On the basis of these observations, I will claim that Agree and Move should be regarded as separate syntactic operations; the task of Agree is to erase uninterpretable features of both probe and goal, and that of Move is to satisfy the EPP-feature. I will also claim that we do not need to keep the thesis that simpler operations (Merge, Agree or their combination) are chosen over Move, even though Move is analyzed as a more complex operation.
ISSN
0254-4474
Language
English
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10371/90830
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 35 Number 1/4 (1999)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse