Publications

Detailed Information

Comparative Review on Domain Name Disputes Resolutions between the WIPO and the IDRC (Korea) Decisions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jung Wook-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-28T00:29:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-28T00:29:40Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Korean Law, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 135-162-
dc.identifier.issn1598-1681-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/91453-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the approaches taken by the Uniform Domain Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Act on Internet Address Resources (AIAR) of Korea in dealing with domain name disputes arising from cybersquatting. By examining the WIPO and the Internet Address Dispute Resolution Committee (IDRC) Panel decisions applying the relevant provisions of the UDRP and the AIAR, respectively, this study aims to shed light on how the UDRP and the AIAR are each designed to handle the myriad of complex issues which occur in connection with cybersquatting.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBK 21 law-
dc.subjectCybersquatting-
dc.subjectWorld Intellectual Property Organization-
dc.subjectUniform Domain Dispute Resolution Policy-
dc.subjectKorea-
dc.subjectAct on Internet Address Resources-
dc.subjectInternet Address Dispute Resolution Committee-
dc.subjecttrademark-
dc.subjectdomain name-
dc.subjectpassive holding-
dc.subjectinitial interest confusion-
dc.titleComparative Review on Domain Name Disputes Resolutions between the WIPO and the IDRC (Korea) Decisions-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조정욱-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Korean Law-
dc.citation.endpage162-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages135-162-
dc.citation.startpage135-
dc.citation.volume12-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share