Publications

Detailed Information

Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOck, Minsu-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorJo, Min-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyeon-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun Joo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jin Yong-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T06:06:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-25T06:06:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10-31-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Family Practice,15(1):178ko_KR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/93595-
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.ko_KR
dc.description.abstractBackground: The primary care system in the Republic of Korea has weakened over the past decade and is now in poorer condition than the systems in other countries. However, little is known about how the two key players, patients and physicians, view the current status of primary care in Korea. This study aims to understand what problems they perceive in respect to the key components of primary care.
Methods: We conducted two focus groups; one with six patients and the other with six physicians. We designed and modified the guidelines for each focus group discussion through repeated review and discussion among all authors and then we conducted the groups with a professional interviewer at Gallup Korea. After the focus groups we analyzed the verbatim transcriptions to identify specific meanings and potential implications.
Results: From the study we identified that the patients and physicians did not have a correct understanding about the role of primary care. We also identified a significant discrepancy between their perception of primary care. In particular, the patient group perceived the quality of primary care to be poor and unsatisfactory while the physician group perceived the quality of primary care to be better in Korea than in other countries.
Conclusions: The focus group discussions revealed that such discrepancies in perception have resulted from Koreas distorted healthcare delivery system, undifferentiated roles among healthcare organizations, patients freedom of choice in selecting healthcare providers and other institutional factors. There are several steps that should be taken to promote primary care in Korea. First, we should undertake efforts to improve the quality of primary care provided by physicians. Second, we should inform the general public about using clinics instead of hospitals for the treatment of simple or minor diseases. Third, we should introduce a new compensation scheme to compensate physicians for services related to health education, disease prevention, behavioral change and nutrition consultation. Finally, we should provide additional reimbursement so that primary care physicians can extend their office hours to better meet the needs of patients.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectPrimary careko_KR
dc.subjectFocus group discussionko_KR
dc.subjectQuality of careko_KR
dc.titlePerceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussionsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor옥민수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김정은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조민우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이현정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김현주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이진용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-014-0178-5-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.rights.holderMinsu Ock et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.date.updated2014-11-18T20:04:39Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share