Publications

Detailed Information

Reputation Matters: Evidence From the Korean War

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, John Speed-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T01:01:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T01:01:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International and Area Studies, Vol.22 No.2, pp. 19-37-
dc.identifier.issn1226-8550-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/96601-
dc.description.abstractBoth sides in the Korean War calculated their adversarys military power and diplomatic resolve by studying their enemys past behavior in addition to their enemys current military posture and diplomatic actions. Past decisions to yield provided adversaries with private information about how leaders perceived their own states military power and resolve. Enemies judged a state that recently yielded as militarily weak or diplomatically indifferent. The preponderance of evidence suggests that leaders should protect their reputation.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInstitute of International Affairs, Graduate School of International Studies, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectReputation-
dc.subjectMilitary Assessment-
dc.subjectPerceptions-
dc.subjectKorean War-
dc.titleReputation Matters: Evidence From the Korean War-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of International and Area Studies-
dc.citation.endpage37-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages19-37-
dc.citation.startpage19-
dc.citation.volume22-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share