Publications
Detailed Information
비교 사회,문화적 문맥에서 본 사법적극주의와 사법소극주의 - 하나의 탐색 - : Judicial Activism / Passivism In Cross Socio,Cultural Contexts - An Exploratory Inquiry -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최대권 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-25T04:47:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-25T04:47:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.46 No.1, pp. 19-39 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9864 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper is designed to analyse a contrast of Korean judicial activism and
Japanese passivism in cross-socio․cultural contexts. A comparative socio․legal study is not an easy task. Our study is necessarily a very tentative one. In Japan, a policy decision including legislation is made on the basis of consensus that has been built on the related matters. Attainment of a consensus takes a longer time but once it is reached, a breakaway from it is not tolerated since Japan is a society where social harmony is seriously taken. In comparative terms, social harmony and consensus in decision-making are normatively taken also seriously in Korea. In practice, however, social dynamism seems to prevail in Korea. Individual personality and autonomy seem to be more pronounced in Korea than in Japan. Attainment of consensus seems to be much harder in Korea than in Japan. Consensus, even if it is reached in decision-makings, does not seem to be as strongly binding on individuals or groups in Korea as in Japan. Social dynamism results therefrom. Korean and Japanese judges seem to share their respective society's socio-cultural characteristics, which in turn seem to be reflected in their respective judicial activism and passivism dichotomy. Korean judges seem to be slightly more autonomous and independent-minded in the judicial hierarchy and toward the government than Japanese counterparts after all. To a great extent, the institutional difference in judicial review of legislation... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2005학년도 연구지원비
의 보조를 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 사법적극주의 한국 | - |
dc.subject | 사법소극주의 일본 | - |
dc.subject | 위헌법률심사권 | - |
dc.subject | 헌법재판소 탄생(1987) | - |
dc.title | 비교 사회,문화적 문맥에서 본 사법적극주의와 사법소극주의 - 하나의 탐색 - | - |
dc.title.alternative | Judicial Activism / Passivism In Cross Socio,Cultural Contexts - An Exploratory Inquiry - | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Choi, Dai Kwon | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 39 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 19-39 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 19 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.