Publications

Detailed Information

분단 60년의 법적 조명 ; "회한과 오욕"의 과거를 바로 잡으려면 -사법부의 과거청산을 위하여- : Review on the 60 Year-Division in Korean Peninsula in the Legal Perspectives ; Dealing with Wrongful Trials under the Authoritarian Regime

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author한인섭-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-28T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-28T03:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citation법학, Vol.46 No.4, pp. 84-120-
dc.identifier.issn1598-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lawi.snu.ac.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/9921-
dc.description.abstractUnder the authoritarian regime, Korean judiciary did not secure its

independence from political dictatorship. As a result, it failed to guarantee the

human rights of the people who had been victimized by the power organs. One

retiring Chief Justice lamented that his term was filled with remorse and

disgrace. Even since the 1987 uprising and a series of democratization process,

judicial decisions were kept intact. This paper focuses on two points. First, why

shall we re-evaluate and right the wrongful trials? Or what kind of solution shall

be made for the victims of abuse of powers? Second, how shall we overcome

the legal barriers if we face the wrongful past trials?

My starting point is that the judiciary has to face its past, and consider the

pains caused by the wrongful convictions seriously. I approach its past wrongs

with the perspective of restorative justice, instead of retributive justice or even

revenge. Healing the victims shall be prime objectives, and national reconciliation

and empowering human rights shall be a final goal. Democratization requires that

old bad laws shall be cleansed, and old bad judicial decisions shall be corrected.

Two legal barriers are worth being considered. First, Korean Criminal

Procedure strictly limits the requirement for opening retrial to the cases that new

evidence shall be discovered enough to be found not guilty. Second, It is

another problem that the statute of limitation already expires when the victims

try to make the civil litigation to the state. Restorative justice requires that these

two barriers shall be solved by the judicial interpretation or by the new lawmaking.

Judicial initiative is needed because the judiciary shall correct what they

did wrong, and because it recover the social trust as the final bulwark of the

human rights.
-
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소기금의 2005학년도 학술연구비의

보조를 받았음.
-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 법학연구소-
dc.subject이용훈 대법원장의 취임사-
dc.subject유지담 대법관의 퇴임사-
dc.subject이영섭 대법원장-
dc.subject사법부의 수난과 인권침해-
dc.subject영장없는 구금이 횡행-
dc.subject국민의 인권을 무시-
dc.subject박종철 고문사(1987년)-
dc.subject강신옥 변호사-
dc.subject제2차 사법민주화운동-
dc.subject사법적 과거청산의 법적 과제-
dc.title분단 60년의 법적 조명 ; "회한과 오욕"의 과거를 바로 잡으려면 -사법부의 과거청산을 위하여--
dc.title.alternativeReview on the 60 Year-Division in Korean Peninsula in the Legal Perspectives ; Dealing with Wrongful Trials under the Authoritarian Regime-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHan, In Sup-
dc.citation.journaltitle법학-
dc.citation.endpage120-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.pages84-120-
dc.citation.startpage84-
dc.citation.volume46-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share