Publications
Detailed Information
경제행정의 세계화-행정의 통제규범으로서 WTO협정? -대법원 2005.9.7. 선고, 2004추10 판결의 평석을 겸하여- : Globalization of National Economic Regulation -WTO-Norm as criterion in the Control of Bureaucracy?-
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김태호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-28T03:32:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-28T03:32:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.46 No.4, pp. 312-348 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9927 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In our age of globalization, the World Trade Organization (WTO) exercises
extensive powers over national economic regulation policy, both implicitly and explicitly. However, there have been few legal analyses of the constitutional legitimacy of its harmonization process in Korea. This article analyses the legitimacy issues from the viewpoint of the rule of law(Rechtsstaat) and the principle of democracy in the Korean constitutional and administrative law and reviews the compatibility of WTO-order with the national public interest related to economic regulation. Recently, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling repealing the Junlabuk-do provincial assembly's ordinance, which sanctioned the preferential use of domestic products in school cafeterias. This ruling is used in this article as a case study to show how far WTO-norm can influence national regulation decision and how the compliance with the WTO-norm could be misconstrued in several respects. The court stated that the ordinance violated the governing principle of the GATT 1994 Article III (national treatment), but the court did not explain whether and how it permitted the judicial enforceability of WTO agreements in the national order. This article criticizes the courts decision, because it did not consider the nature of the WTO-norm in relation to the principles of reciprocity and the attitude of the Korean Congress, which did not declare that the WTO-norm was directly applicable to the country. It cannot be denied, on the other hand, that the government needs to keep... | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 의회의 법률제정권 | - |
dc.subject | 국제규범과 국내규범이 충돌 | - |
dc.subject | 전북급식조례사건 | - |
dc.subject | GATT는 헌법 제6조 제1항 | - |
dc.title | 경제행정의 세계화-행정의 통제규범으로서 WTO협정? -대법원 2005.9.7. 선고, 2004추10 판결의 평석을 겸하여- | - |
dc.title.alternative | Globalization of National Economic Regulation -WTO-Norm as criterion in the Control of Bureaucracy?- | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Kim, Tae Ho | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 348 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 312-348 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 312 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.