Browse

Quanta v. LG 판결이 한국에서 가진 의미에 대한 소고(小考)
The study on the meaning of Quanta v. LG decision by U.S. Supreme Court to Korea

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박준석-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-07T02:48:18Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-07T02:48:18Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citation법학, Vol.49 No.3, pp. 444-491-
dc.identifier.issn1598-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lawi.snu.ac.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/10235-
dc.description.abstractIn June 9, 2008, U.S. Supreme Court declared in Quanta v. LG decision that the

patent-exhaustion doctrine should be applied not only to the patent for apparatus

invents but also to method patents. This position is to discourage patent drafters

from disguising their patent claims as method patents even though those are

actually apparatus invents. However, U.S. Supreme Court left open the question of

whether a patentee could exclude the application of the patent-exhaustion doctrine

by inserting a clear restriction into his patent license agreement. Though there have

been relatively few studies about these issues in Korea, the above decision will be

a good guidance for our countrys forthcoming cases.

On the other hand, U.S. Supreme Court in this case once again put a brake on

CAFCs continuing attitude toward pro-patentee bias. From the Festo decision in

2002 to Quanta v. LG decision in this time through the eBay v. MercExchange

decision in 2006, the MedImmune decision in January 2007, the KSR decision &

the Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp decision in April 2007, U.S. Supreme Court

had continually reversed CAFCs judgments, demanding to take a more broader

view considering not only the protection for patentees but the promotion for fair

competition in market. Because Korea has the Patent Court of Korea whose status

is similar to that of CAFC in US, it will become more and more important for the

Supreme Court of Korea to properly guide the Patent Court of Korea not to expose

the drawbacks of a specialized court.

Also, this decision in Quanta v. LG case will probably be the reading case in

US patent law area where the Korean major corporation appeared on the stage as a

party for the first time. This situation suggests that our corporations technological...
-
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2008학년도 학술연구비

의 보조를 받았음.
-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 법학연구소-
dc.subject특허권 소진-
dc.subject특허 라이선스-
dc.subject방법특허-
dc.subject실시허락-
dc.subject연방특허항소법원-
dc.subject특허법원-
dc.subjectpatent exhaustion-
dc.subjectmethod patents-
dc.subjectCAFC-
dc.subjectKSR-
dc.subjectpatent License-
dc.subjectFesto-
dc.titleQuanta v. LG 판결이 한국에서 가진 의미에 대한 소고(小考)-
dc.title.alternativeThe study on the meaning of Quanta v. LG decision by U.S. Supreme Court to Korea-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorPark, Jun Seok-
dc.citation.journaltitle법학-
dc.citation.endpage491-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.pages444-491-
dc.citation.startpage444-
dc.citation.volume49-
Appears in Collections:
College of Law/Law School (법과대학/대학원)The Law Research Institute (법학연구소) 법학법학 Volume 49, Number 1/4 (2008)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse