Publications
Detailed Information
Quanta v. LG 판결이 한국에서 가진 의미에 대한 소고(小考) : The study on the meaning of Quanta v. LG decision by U.S. Supreme Court to Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박준석 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-07T02:48:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-07T02:48:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.49 No.3, pp. 444-491 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10235 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In June 9, 2008, U.S. Supreme Court declared in Quanta v. LG decision that the
patent-exhaustion doctrine should be applied not only to the patent for apparatus invents but also to method patents. This position is to discourage patent drafters from disguising their patent claims as method patents even though those are actually apparatus invents. However, U.S. Supreme Court left open the question of whether a patentee could exclude the application of the patent-exhaustion doctrine by inserting a clear restriction into his patent license agreement. Though there have been relatively few studies about these issues in Korea, the above decision will be a good guidance for our countrys forthcoming cases. On the other hand, U.S. Supreme Court in this case once again put a brake on CAFCs continuing attitude toward pro-patentee bias. From the Festo decision in 2002 to Quanta v. LG decision in this time through the eBay v. MercExchange decision in 2006, the MedImmune decision in January 2007, the KSR decision & the Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp decision in April 2007, U.S. Supreme Court had continually reversed CAFCs judgments, demanding to take a more broader view considering not only the protection for patentees but the promotion for fair competition in market. Because Korea has the Patent Court of Korea whose status is similar to that of CAFC in US, it will become more and more important for the Supreme Court of Korea to properly guide the Patent Court of Korea not to expose the drawbacks of a specialized court. Also, this decision in Quanta v. LG case will probably be the reading case in US patent law area where the Korean major corporation appeared on the stage as a party for the first time. This situation suggests that our corporations technological... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2008학년도 학술연구비
의 보조를 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 특허권 소진 | - |
dc.subject | 특허 라이선스 | - |
dc.subject | 방법특허 | - |
dc.subject | 실시허락 | - |
dc.subject | 연방특허항소법원 | - |
dc.subject | 특허법원 | - |
dc.subject | patent exhaustion | - |
dc.subject | method patents | - |
dc.subject | CAFC | - |
dc.subject | KSR | - |
dc.subject | patent License | - |
dc.subject | Festo | - |
dc.title | Quanta v. LG 판결이 한국에서 가진 의미에 대한 소고(小考) | - |
dc.title.alternative | The study on the meaning of Quanta v. LG decision by U.S. Supreme Court to Korea | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Park, Jun Seok | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 491 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 444-491 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 444 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 49 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.