Browse

JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images

Cited 32 time in Web of Science Cited 31 time in Scopus
Authors
Woo, Hyoun Sik; Kim, Kil Joong; Kim, Tae Jung; Hahn, Seokyung; Kim, Bohyoung; Kim, Young Hoon; Lee, Kyoung Ho
Issue Date
2007-08-24
Publisher
American Roentgen Ray Society
Citation
AJR 2007; 189:535-541
Keywords
Anatomy, Cross-Sectional/*methodsData Compression/*methodsRadiographic Image Enhancement/*methodsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methodsRadiography, Abdominal/*methodsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the tolerance of Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compression between thin- and thick-section abdominal CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred 0.67-mm-thick and corresponding 5-mm-thick images were compressed to four different levels: reversible and irreversible 6:1, 10:1, and 15:1. Five radiologists determined if the compressed images were distinguishable from the originals. The percentage of distinguishable pairs and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were compared between the thin and thick sections. The visually lossless threshold was estimated by comparing the percentages of the distinguishable pairs between each irreversible compression and the reversible compression. Paired Student's t tests and exact tests for paired proportions were used. RESULTS: Thin sections had smaller PSNRs at each compression level (p < 0.001). According to the pooled responses, the percentages of distinguishable pairs for the thin and thick sections, respectively, were 0% (0/100) and 0% at reversible compression, 27% and 0% at 6:1 (p < 0.001), 100% and 80% at 10:1 (p < 0.001), and 100% and 100% at 15:1. Artifacts increased significantly (p < 0.001) at 6:1 or more for the thin sections and at 10:1 and 15:1 for the thick sections, indicating that the visually lossless thresholds were below 6:1 and between 6:1 and 10:1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thin-section abdominal CT images are less tolerant of compression, and a lower compression level should be used for the visually lossless threshold.
ISSN
1546-3141 (Electronic)
Language
English
URI
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17715097

https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2304
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Dept. of Radiation Applied Life Science (대학원 협동과정 방사선응용생명과학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_방사선응용생명과학전공)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse