Publications

Detailed Information

A novel quantitative cross-validation of different cortical surface reconstruction algorithms using MRI phantom

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jun Ki-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, June Sic-
dc.contributor.authorKim, In Young-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Alan C.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sun I.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-20T22:33:15Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-20T22:33:15Z-
dc.date.issued2006-02-24-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroimage 31 (2), 572-584en
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16503170-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/10567-
dc.description.abstractCortical surface reconstruction is important for functional brain mapping and morphometric analysis of the brain cortex. Several methods have been developed for the faithful reconstruction of surface models which represent the true cortical surface in both geometry and topology. However, there has been no explicit comparison study among those methods because each method has its own procedures, file formats, coordinate systems, and use of the reconstructed surface. There has also been no explicit evaluation method except visual inspection to validate the whole-cortical surface models quantitatively. In this study, we presented a novel phantom-based validation method of the cortical surface reconstruction algorithm and quantitatively cross-validated the three most prominent cortical surface reconstruction algorithms which are used in Freesurfer, BrainVISA, and CLASP, respectively. The validation included geometrical accuracy and mesh characteristics such as Euler number, fractal dimension (FD), total surface area, and local density of points. CLASP showed the best geometric/topologic accuracy and mesh characteristics such as FD and total surface area compared to Freesurfer and BrainVISA. In the validation of local density of points, Freesurfer and BrainVISA showed more even distribution of points on the cortical surface compared to CLASP.en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectCortical surface reconstruction algorithmen
dc.subjectQuantitative validationen
dc.subjectMR phantomen
dc.subjectCLASPen
dc.subjectBrainVISAen
dc.subjectFreesurferen
dc.titleA novel quantitative cross-validation of different cortical surface reconstruction algorithms using MRI phantomen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이준기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이종민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김준식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김인영-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.044-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share