Publications

Detailed Information

Dosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee Jung-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ah Ram-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yang-Kyun-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Sung-Joon-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-17T08:35:27Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-17T17:54:36Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-18-
dc.identifier.citationRadiation Oncology, 8(1):244ko_KR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/109831-
dc.description.abstractBackground
To investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) contrast enhancement (CE) on the 3D dose distributions of non-coplanar small field beams in the CyberKnife (CK) treatment planning system (TPS) for the stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods
Twenty-two pre-CE CT treatment plans were recruited to this retrospective plan study. Their post-CE CT plans were based on the pre-CE CT plan data and calculated using the same MU and beam paths in either Ray-Tracing or Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. The differences in the doses of the beam path and the reference point between the pre- and post-CE CT plans were compared. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses in dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of target and organs-at-risk (OARs) were also compared.

Results
The dose differences between the pre- and post-CE plans in a single beam path were less than 1.05% in both calculation algorithms, with respect to the prescription dose. At the center of the target volume, it was 1.9% (maximum 6.2%) in Ray-Tracing and 1.6% (maximum 4.0%) in MC. The CA effect showed on average 1.2% difference in the OAR maximum dose (maximum 7.8% in Ray-Tracing and 7.2% in MC). In the lung cases, the CT CE resulted in a dose difference of 2.4% (from 1.0% to 6.5%) without the calculation algorithm effect (maximum 20.3%).

Conclusions
The CK treatment plan using the post-CE CT generally afforded less than 2% dose differences from the pre-CE CT plan. However, it could be up to 7.8% depending on the target positions in a body and be more than 20% with the calculation algorithms. Thus, the post-CE CT in CK treatment plans should be used with careful consideration for the CA effect, target position, and calculation algorithm factors.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectCyberKnifeko_KR
dc.subjectCT contrastko_KR
dc.subjectSmall field beamko_KR
dc.titleDosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plansko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김희정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장아람-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박양균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor예성준-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-717X-8-244-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderKim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.date.updated2017-01-06T10:37:13Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share