Publications

Detailed Information

Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sue Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Daehee-
dc.contributor.authorMcGlynn, Katherine A-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Closas, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yeonju-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Keun Young-
dc.contributor.authorBrinton, Louise A-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-11T02:17:32Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-11T15:35:29Z-
dc.date.issued2008-01-21-
dc.identifier.citationBreast Cancer Research, 21;10(1):R8ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1465-542X-
dc.identifier.uri10.1186/bcr1850-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/117778-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction
Various perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample biologic plausibility, epidemiologic studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the associations between perinatal factors and subsequent breast cancer risk through meta-analyses.

Methods
We reviewed breast cancer studies published from January 1966 to February 2007 that included data on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking. Meta-analyses using random effect models were employed to summarize the results.

Results
We found that heavier birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk, with studies involving five categories of birth weight identifying odds ratios (ORs) of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.48) for 4,000 g or more and 1.15 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) for 3,500 g to 3,999 g, relative to a birth weight of 2,500 to 2,599 g. These studies provided no support for a J-shaped relationship of birthweight to risk. Support for an association with birthweight was also derived from studies based on three birth weight categories (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.31] for ≥4,000 g relative to <3,000 g) and two birth weight categories (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.18] for ≥3,000 g relative to <3,000 g). Women born to older mothers and twins were also at some increased risk, but the results were heterogeneous across studies and publication years. Birth order, prematurity, and maternal smoking were unrelated to breast cancer risk.

Conclusion
Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that in utero exposures reflective of higher endogenous hormone levels could affect risk for development of breast cancer in adulthood.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.titleIntrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic reviewko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박수경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강대희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김연주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor유근영-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderPark et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.date.updated2017-07-09T03:22:57Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share