Publications

Detailed Information

Adaptation Strategy and Selection Mechanism under Shakeout : The Cases of Automobile and Mobile Phone Industries

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor이정동-
dc.contributor.author길태준-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T08:55:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-13T08:55:57Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.other000000022090-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/119950-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 협동과정 기술경영·경제·정책전공, 2014. 8. 이정동.-
dc.description.abstractAfter an industry emerge and is introduced on the market, a number of firms continue to enter the industry until the net entry of firms become saturated on the point so called "Shakeout". Shakeout describes phenomenon that net entry of firms on certain industry rapidly falls although market size continue to rise.
According to the industry life cycle theory, the industry face dramatic change during shakeout period. For instance, almost perfectly competitive market would becomes monopoly or oligopoly structure during this time.
A number of economist studying empirical industrial organization have been trying to analyze survival mechanism on the period in which each firm face radical change in competitive environment. Their findings pointed out that the firm size, the time of market entrance and ex ante experience of firms before entering the new industry are significant variables to determine firm survival during shakeout process. These results do not contribute firm's strategic decision making because the factors they represented are only within environmental factors which individual firms never change. However, according to the theory regarding firm behavior in evolutionary economy, firm survival are influenced by environmental factors as well as active decision making which are called "selection" and "adaptation" in evolutionary economy context. Evolutionary economy regard firm active decision maker every moment. Therefore the aim of this research is to examine both deterministic and non-deterministic factors affecting firm survival during shakeout in one unified framework based on principle of evolutionary economy. In addition, dividing pre-Shakeout, Shakeout and post-Shakeout period to consider industry dynamics.
To measure companies adaptation strategies objectively, this paper uses products level data distinctively. I analyzed data on 21,337 kinds of new automobile products in American automobile industry from 1905 to 1942 and 5,508 kinds of new mobile phone products from 1994 to 2012. This paper includes four companies adaptation strategies such as technology level, technology growth, product dispersion and product difference using these data.
Main results are followings. First, companies which has higher technology growth shows higher survival rate in pre-shakeout period. Since products does not meet the consumers needs in this period. Second, higher product difference shows higher survival rate. Although dominant design was emerged before shakeout period, imitating dominant design strategy can reduce companies survival rate. This is because companies which imitate dominant design can also surfer price competition pressure.
The implications of this research are summarized as follows. First, the research demonstrates that the principle and framework suggested by evolutionary economists are effective and valuable in explaining firm survival mechanism. It implies further that the firms are not a passive actor in survival process but an active decision maker which enable firms to overcome huddles during shakeout. Second, the result shows that using product level data is helpful to describe and understand firm behavior. Especially, it prove that firm heterogeneity can be explained by observing all products a firm makes.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract iii
Contents vii
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xv
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Study background and purpose 1
1.2 Research scope and method 3
1.3 Contribution of this study 6
1.4 Paper organization 7
Chapter 2. Theoretical background 9
2.1 Evolutionary economics and industry life cycle theory 9
2.2 Selection and adaptation mechanism of evolutionary economics 11
2.3 Evolution of industry and the industry life cycle theory 13
2.3.1 Changes in terms of innovation 14
2.3.2 Changes in terms of production volume and firm size 17
2.3.3 Changes in terms of regime 18
2.3.4 Changes in terms of entry and exit 20
2.4 Definition of the shakeout phenomenon and cause of occurrence 26
2.4.1 Definition of the shakeout phenomenon 27
2.4.2 Cause of occurrence of the shakeout phenomenon 29
2.5 Sub-conclusion 35
Chapter 3. Adaptation strategies and selection mechanisms during the shakeout period 37
3.1 Frame of literature review 37
3.2 Adaptation strategies and selection mechanisms under shakeout 38
3.2.1 Size of firms 38
3.2.2 Entry timing 42
3.2.3 Experiences prior to the entry 47
3.2.4 Innovativeness 49
3.3 Sub-conclusion 51
Chapter 4. Adaptation strategies and selection mechanism in the US automobile industry 64
4.1 Empirical research of US automobile industry 64
4.2 Study design and hypothesis 68
4.2.1 Analysis of product level 68
4.2.2 Technological level of firms 69
4.2.3 Technology increase rate of firms 71
4.2.4 Product dispersion of firms 72
4.2.5 Product differentiation of firms 73
4.3 Analysis model 75
4.3.1 Survival analysis 75
4.3.2 Division of time by shakeout 81
4.3.3 Technology assessment of products using the Hedonic price model 83
4.3.4 Adaptation strategy variables of firms 85
4.4 Empirical analysis 91
4.4.1 The US automobile industry 91
4.4.2 Data and variables 94
4.4.3 Survival analysis result 112
4.5 Sub-conclusion 121
Chapter 5. Adaptation strategy and selection mechanism in the mobile industry 124
5.1 Empirical research of mobile industry 124
5.2 Study design and hypothesis 126
5.2.1 Technological level of firms 126
5.2.2 Technology increase rate of firms 126
5.2.3 Product dispersion of firm 127
5.2.4 Product differentiation of firms 128
5.3 Analysis model 130
5.3.1 Survival analysis 130
5.3.2 Adaptation strategy variable 133
5.4 Empirical analysis 134
5.4.1 Mobile industry 134
5.4.2 Data and variables 136
5.4.3 Survival analysis result 157
5.5 Sub-conclusion 167
Chapter 6. Conclusion 171
6.1 Summary of this study 171
6.1.1 Adaptation strategy and selection mechanism at the shakeout period 171
6.1.2 Adaptation strategies and selection mechanism in the US automobile industry 173
6.1.3 Adaptation strategy and selection mechanism in the mobile industry 175
6.2 Implications 179
6.3 Contribution and limitation 180
Bibliography 184
Appendix 203
Abstract (Korean) 208
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1620144 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectShakeout-
dc.subjectIndustry Lifecycle Theory-
dc.subjectProduct Analysis-
dc.subjectEvolutionary Economics-
dc.subjectSelection and Adaptation-
dc.subjectSurvival Analysis-
dc.subject.ddc658-
dc.titleAdaptation Strategy and Selection Mechanism under Shakeout : The Cases of Automobile and Mobile Phone Industries-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKil Tae-Joon-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pagesxvi, 212-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 협동과정 기술경영·경제·정책전공-
dc.date.awarded2014-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share