Publications

Detailed Information

Comparing QWERTY and Dvorak Keyboard Speed: a Pilot Study : QWERTY와 드보락 키보드의 속도 비교: 시험 연구

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorRobert Ian McKay-
dc.contributor.author조항준-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T02:57:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T02:57:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.other000000021479-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/123098-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 전기·컴퓨터공학부, 2014. 8. Robert Ian McKay.-
dc.description.abstractThe comparison between QWERTY and Dvorak layouts has been a controversial for many years. It is well known that QWERTY layout was not designed for efficient English typing. Conversely, Dvorak layout was developed by considering the characteristics of English. Nevertheless neither layout has been demonstrated empirically to be superior. The main reason is that it is almost impossible to find people who are equally skilled in both layouts. Comparative studies measuring the typing speed on Dvorak against QWERTY have generally failed to remove biases arising from the unequal familiarity of users.
In preceding research, we suggested an efficient methodology for screening ultimate typing speed for different key layouts. Because it uses the users familiarity with the generally-used layout, it naturally also has biases. However these biases can be easily quantified and corrected. We had shown this methods validity and effectiveness from the relatively large-scale experiments in mobile keypads with a wider range of users.
We apply this screening method to QWERTY and Dvorak to figure out which layout is faster and how much which layout is more efficient. We built a web based system to gather a large amount of detailed typing data in small cost. This enabled the objective comparison between two layouts and also discovering characteristics of English typing. This information can be beneficial to develop new input devices or methods for various computing devices these days.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract i
Contents iii
List of Figures v
List of Tables vi

Chapter 1 Introduction 1

Chapter 2 Background 4
2.1 Ignoring the Familiarity Issue 5
2.2 Restricting Testing to Novices 7
2.3 Provision of Training Sessions 8
2.4 Detailed Observation of the Learning Progress 9

Chapter 3 Methodology 13
3.1 Familiarity Issues 13
3.2 Handling Location Memory through Character Mapping 15
3.3 Removing Finger Memory Bias using Layout Transformation 17
3.4 Layout Transformation for QWERTY vs. Dvorak 20
3.5 Overall Experimental Protocol 24
3.6 Test Set Generation 24
3.7 Web-based Experiment 26

Chapter 4 Results 28
4.1 Distribution of Test Set 28
4.2 Research Participant Recruitment 29
4.3 Overall Results 31
4.4 Key-level Analysis 35

Chapter 5 Discussion 37
5.1 Effect of Reflections 38
5.2 Statistical Issue 39

Chapter 6 Conclusion 40
6.1 Cautious Forecast: Dvoraks Slight Win is Not a Victory 40
6.2 Assumptions and Limitations 41
6.3 Epilogue 42

요약 48
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent2710165 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectkeyboard-
dc.subjectspeed-
dc.subjectcomparison-
dc.subjectQWERTY-
dc.subjectDvorak-
dc.subject.ddc621-
dc.titleComparing QWERTY and Dvorak Keyboard Speed: a Pilot Study-
dc.title.alternativeQWERTY와 드보락 키보드의 속도 비교: 시험 연구-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHanggjun Cho-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesvi, 48-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 전기·컴퓨터공학부-
dc.date.awarded2014-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share