Publications

Detailed Information

Construction Knowledge Management focusing on Acquisition Types

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor박문서-
dc.contributor.author조락영-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T03:54:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T03:54:00Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-
dc.identifier.other000000017859-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/124049-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 건축학과, 2014. 2. 박문서.-
dc.description.abstractThere was a strong Knowledge Management (KM) boom among the Korea Contracting firms in the late 1990s and the early 2000s. For the last ten years, Contracting firms have developed Knowledge Management System (KMS) and operated learning organizations since they realized the significance of managing knowledge to gain a competitive advantage over rival companies in todays fast-paced business environment. These efforts seem to have paid off. But the difficulties in evaluating the effectiveness of KM strategy make it hard to improve contracting firms KM strategy. This paper investigates how major Korea contracting firms employees exploit knowledge in construction sites to assess effectiveness of KM. It adopts the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) methodology to carry out a survey on construction site employees knowledge acquisition route and the CA (Correspondence Analysis) to investigate the differences in knowledge acquisition route depending on employees project type, position (rank) and profession in their construction sites.
The study finds that there is correlation between the pattern of knowledge acquisition and employees attributes that are rank and occupational type. The results of case study showed some interesting implications and it could be useful and basic information to set the KM strategy in contracting firms
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Objective and Process 3

Chapter 2 Preliminary Study 5
2.1 Narrowing the Scope of Knowledge 5
2.2 Characteristics of Construction Industry KM 7
2.3 Strategic Classification of KM for Construction Industry 8
2.4 Analysis Methodology 11

Chapter 3 Characteristics of Knowledge Transfer Process for each KM Strategy 14
3.1 Codification Strategy 16
3.2 Personalization Strategy 18

Chapter 4 Study Design : Classification of Knowledge Acquisition Route 20

Chapter 5 Case Study 23
5.1 Survey Target 23
5.2 Analysis for Knowledge Acquisition Routes 25
5.3 Application 35

Chapter 6 Conclusion 40
6.1 Summary 40
6.2 Contribution 42
6.3 Further Study 43

Appendices 44

Reference 49

Abstract (Korean) 52
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1947428 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectConstruction KM-
dc.subjectKM Strategy-
dc.subjectKnowledge transfer process-
dc.subjectKnowledge acquisition route-
dc.subject.ddc690-
dc.titleConstruction Knowledge Management focusing on Acquisition Types-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesvi, 52-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건축학과-
dc.date.awarded2014-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share