Publications
Detailed Information
Protecting the Textile Carpet Industry by Intellectual Property Rights : 섬유 카펫 산업에서의 지적재산권 보호
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Sang Jo Jong | - |
dc.contributor.author | 바히데 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-19T03:40:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-19T03:40:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-02 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 000000140890 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/128756 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 법학과, 2017. 2. 정상조. | - |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation examines the role of intellectual property law in the textile
carpet industry and the aids that each rubric of this discipline provides for the protection of intellectual properties in this industry. A carpet has different components and each of these components requires different protections according to its characteristics. Therefore, in order to provide a better understanding, these components are divided into three categories, namely: (1) reputation of origin (2) external appearance and | - |
dc.description.abstract | (3) know-how.
Apart from analysing international intellectual property provisions applicable to this industry, current research, by using related lawsuits within the United States and the United Kingdom, determines that copyright is the dominant means for protecting designs in the carpet industry. In contrast, the Iranian legal system applies industrial design rights to protect this feature of carpets. Besides, despite the importance of geographical indications and traditional cultural expressions in the carpet industry, there are not enough and effective ii legal provisions at the national and international levels for comprehensive protection for appellation of origin and traditional cultural expressions in the carpet industry. Therefore, it is necessary to use alternative measures such as concluding multilateral or bilateral IP agreements as well as alternative rubrics of intellectual property law to preserve the latter features. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW 3 SECTION 2: EVOLUTION OF THE CARPET INDUSTRY AND EMERSION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES 7 CHAPTER II: PROTECTING THE CARPET INDUSTRY BY DIFFERENT FIELDS OF IPRS 10 SECTION 1: PROTECTING REPUTATION AND DISTINCTIVENESS OF CARPETS 12 1.1. Geographical Indications (GIs) 12 1.1.1. Registering appellation of origin under the Lisbon Agreement 16 1.1.2. Protecting indication of source under Madrid agreement 16 1.1.3. Concluding Bilateral Agreements for Protecting Geographical Indications 17 1.1.4. Protecting GIs under TRIPS agreement 17 1.2. Trade,arls 19 1.2.1. Certification Marks 21 1.2.2. Collective marks 22 1.3. Protecting Against Unfair Competition 23 SECTION 2: PROTECTING THE EXTERNAL APPEARANCE OF CARPETS (DESIGN) 26 2.1. Industrial designs 29 2.2. Copyrights 30 2.3. Protecting the External Appearance of Carpets under the United States Legal System 32 2.3.1 . Copyright law in the United States 35 2.3.1.1. Originality 35 2.3.1.2. Establishing Copyright Infringement in Carpet Design 36 2.3.1.2.1.Validity 36 2.3.1.2.2. Actual Copying and Substantial Similarities 38 2.3.1.2.3. Access 39 2.4. Protecting the External Appearance of Carpets Under the United Kingdoms Law 40 2.4.1. Protecting Textile Designs by Copyrights 42 2.4.1.1.Substantial Copying 42 2.4.1.2. Causal Connection Between the Two Works 45 SECTION 3: KNOW-HOW 48 3.1.Patents 48 CHAPTER III. PROTECTING CARPETS UNDER THE IRANIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM 50 SECTION 1. THE HISTORY OF IP INFRINGEMENTS IN IRANS CARPET INDUSTRY 50 SECTION 2: CONTEMPORARY PROVISIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF IPRS IN THE CARPET INDUSTRY 53 SECTION 3: PROTECTING THE EXTERNAL APPEARANCE OF RUGS IN IRAN 58 SECTION 4: PROTECTING THE REPUTATION OF IRANIAN CARPETS 61 4.1. Protecting Carpets Under Geographical Indications in Iran 63 SECTION 5: DISCUSSION 64 CHAPTER IV: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROTECTING CARPETS IN THE UK, US AND IRAN FROM THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE 69 SECTION 1: THE CLASSIC APPROACH 69 SECTION 2: THE CURRENT APPROACH FOR PROTECTING TEXTILE DESIGNS 71 2.1. Comparative Analysis on Protecting Composition of Patterns, Colors and Motifs in Textile Products 72 2.1.1.Requirements for Obtaining Legal Protection 73 2.2.Protecting the Shape and Configuration of Textile Products 76 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 79 BIBLIOGRAPHY 83 | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.extent | 2018400 bytes | - |
dc.format.medium | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.subject | Textile carpet industry | - |
dc.subject | Intellectual property rights | - |
dc.subject | Reputation and distinctiveness | - |
dc.subject | External appearance | - |
dc.subject | Traditional cultural expressions | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 340 | - |
dc.title | Protecting the Textile Carpet Industry by Intellectual Property Rights | - |
dc.title.alternative | 섬유 카펫 산업에서의 지적재산권 보호 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Vahideh Hekmat | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.citation.pages | 89 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 법과대학 법학과 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2017-02 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.