Publications

Detailed Information

Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw fixation system in spinal adjacent levels using polyetheretherketone, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone, and traditional titanium as rod materials

Cited 56 time in Web of Science Cited 63 time in Scopus
Authors

Kang, Kyoung-Tak; Koh, Yong-Gon; Son, Juhyun; Yeom, Jin S.; Park, Joon-Hee; Kim, Ho-Joong

Issue Date
2017-12
Publisher
Pergamon Press Ltd.
Citation
Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol.130, pp.248-256
Abstract
In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of changing the material properties of the fixation rod on adjacent segments of the spine, with respect to the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK, and traditional titanium (Ti) rods. Using a validated intact lumbar finite element model for L2-L5, interbody fusion models for L3-L4 in one-level and L3-L5 in two-levels were developed using rod materials with three different stiffness values. The highest and lowest disc pressure increments and facet joint contact forces were found on the adjacent segments with the Ti and PEEK rods fixation systems, respectively. However, there was no difference in values for disc pressure and contact force in the facet joint between PEEK and CFR-PEEK. CFR-PEEK is a better alternative for fixation rod material for spinal fusion compared to PEEK and Ti. CFR-PEEK rod systems reduce the risk of pedicle screw breakage compared to PEEK. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1359-8368
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/148604
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.052
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share