Publications
Detailed Information
A Critical Juncture in Data Protection Standards: Comparing Data Protection Legislation in the United States and the European Union : 데이터 보호 표준의 중요한 분기점 미국과 유럽연합의 데이터 보호 법률 비교
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 신성호 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kayleen Hyun Min Choi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-13T03:08:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-13T03:08:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 000000163359 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/169595 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000163359 | ko_KR |
dc.description | 학위논문 (석사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제대학원 국제학과(국제협력전공), 2020. 8. 신성호. | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the last few decades, technology has faced an extraordinary evolution that has revolutionized the way we communicate. In particular, the rise of the Internet and digital platforms has turned data into an incredibly powerful, global resource. Yet, through the increasing sophistication of technology, the world now faces a major privacy dilemma, and governments must make critical decisions to determine whether established privacy laws encompass personal data on the Internet.
As leaders in technological innovation and privacy legislation, the world is looking to the United States and the European Union to establish standards in data protection. However, despite ideological similarities between the two powers, it is clear that the U.S. and EU have vastly different approaches to data legislation. On one hand, the EU has passed the most comprehensive and strictest data protection rules in the world, while the U.S. has struggled to institute uniform regulations. A sharp rise in cyber-attacks and data misuse cases have led many to question why the U.S. has been unable or unwilling to legislate protection laws, while the EU has been quick to do so. With mounting public pressure, the U.S. now faces a critical juncture in its data policies, and must delineate its stance on data protection. In order to unpack the current approaches to data protection in the U.S. and the EU, this research will dive into the historical response to privacy and personal information through comparative analysis and case studies. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter I. Introduction 1
1. Background 1 2. Literature Review 3 Chapter II. Research Plan 14 1. Research Question 14 2. Significance of the Research 17 3. Research Methodology 18 4. Conceptual Framework 19 Chapter III. Data Protection Legislation in the European Union 22 1. Defining "personal information" in the EU 22 2. A History of Data Protection in the EU 23 3. The EU'S General Data Protection Regulations 27 4. Initial Reactions to GDPR 33 5. Analysis of EU Data Protection Laws 34 Chapter IV. Data Protection Legislation in the United States 36 1. Defining "personal information" in the U.S. 36 2. U.S. Data Protection Legislation 38 3. U.S. Case Studies 50 4. Barriers to Legislation in the U.S. 54 5. Analysis of U.S. Data Protection Laws 59 Chapter V. Comparative Analysis 60 Chapter VI. Conclusion 63 Bibliography 68 Tables and Figures - 79 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.subject | Data protection | - |
dc.subject | personal information | - |
dc.subject | privacy | - |
dc.subject | GDPR | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 327.17 | - |
dc.title | A Critical Juncture in Data Protection Standards: Comparing Data Protection Legislation in the United States and the European Union | - |
dc.title.alternative | 데이터 보호 표준의 중요한 분기점 미국과 유럽연합의 데이터 보호 법률 비교 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.type | Dissertation | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 최현민 | - |
dc.contributor.department | 국제대학원 국제학과(국제협력전공) | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2020-08 | - |
dc.identifier.uci | I804:11032-000000163359 | - |
dc.identifier.holdings | 000000000043▲000000000048▲000000163359▲ | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.