Publications

Detailed Information

A conceptual framework for Emergency department design in a pandemic

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNadarajan, Gayathri D-
dc.contributor.authorOmar, Eunizar-
dc.contributor.authorAbella, Benjamin S-
dc.contributor.authorHoe, Pei S-
dc.contributor.authorDo Shin, Sang-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Matthew H-
dc.contributor.authorOng, Marcus E H-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T08:13:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-12T17:14:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-17-
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2020 Dec 17;28(1):118ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/173573-
dc.description.abstractBackground
The current COVID-19 pandemic is highlighting gaps around the world in the design and workflow of Emergency Departments (ED). These gaps have an impact on both patient care and staff safety and represent a risk to public health. There is a need for a conceptual framework to guide ED design and workflow to address these challenges. Such a framework is important as the ED environment will always remain vulnerable to infectious diseases outbreaks in the future.

Aims
This paper aims to address issues and principles around ED design and workflow amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose a conceptual framework and checklist for EDs to be prepared for future outbreaks as well.

Methods
A scoping literature review was conducted, of the experiences of EDs in managing outbreaks such as SARS, H1N1 and COVID-19. The combined experiences of the authors and the experiences from the literature were grouped under common themes to develop the conceptual framework.

Results
Four key principles were derived- (1) situational awareness, surveillance and perimeter defence, (2) ED staff protection, (3) surge capacity management and (4) ED recovery. The findings were integrated in a proposed conceptual framework to guide ED design in response to an infectious disease outbreak. There are various elements which need to be considered at ED input, throughput and output. These elements can be categorised into (1) system (workflow, protocols and communication), (2) staff (human resources), (3) space (infrastructure), and (4) supply (logistics) and are placed in a checklist for pragmatic use.

Conclusion
The ED needs to be in a constant state of preparedness. A framework can be useful to guide ED design and workflow to achieve this. As all ED systems are different with varying capabilities, our framework may help EDs across the world prepare for infectious disease outbreaks.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2, COVID-19-
dc.subjectEmergency department-
dc.subjectOperation-
dc.subjectPandemic-
dc.subjectFramework-
dc.titleA conceptual framework for Emergency department design in a pandemicko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor상도신-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13049-020-00809-7-
dc.citation.journaltitleScandinavian Journal of Traumako_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2021-01-27T10:08:36Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage118ko_KR
dc.citation.volume28ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share